-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CITGM is in deep trouble #1067
Comments
This is also filed as npm/cli#7657, and nodejs/node#53462 was pointed to me as a possible cause. |
I think the cause is nodejs/node#53627, but this issue is not about the regression itself. It's about the fact that CITGM somehow reported successful runs instead of failures. |
@nodejs/build-infra I believe this is an issue with the Jenkins job. If I run |
Possibilities:
I'll turn off |
Rerunning https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3457/nodes=debian12-x64/ with |
With |
That's better, thanks ! Now do we need to investigate why it "thinks" there are no results ? |
https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3459/nodes=debian12-x64/console
which likely means we use
|
Here's the
And with Node.js 22.5.1:
|
FWIW another fast api regression made it through CITGM: nodejs/node#54518 |
We got a regression in the latest v22.5.0 that affects at least yarn and npm: nodejs/node#53902
It seems that citgm would have caught it, but for jobs end up green even when they have lots of failures.
From https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3457/nodes=debian12-x64/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: