Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Charter? #130

Closed
williamkapke opened this issue Apr 2, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Charter? #130

williamkapke opened this issue Apr 2, 2016 · 10 comments
Labels

Comments

@williamkapke
Copy link

Is there a Charter in the works for this Working Group?
Is this targeted to be a Top-Level Working Group?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 2, 2016

The help repository really isn't a WG. It's largely just a forum for asking and answering general questions that should not go to the main repository.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 2, 2016

In other words... it's more a team of dedicated collaborators who quite helpfully take the time to answer questions that come in than a formal WG. That said, if those collaborators wanted to make it a WG, I certainly wouldn't object ;-)

@williamkapke
Copy link
Author

I kinda thought so- but it says it is a WG with members in the README so I thought I'd ask.

@subfuzion
Copy link

@williamkapke The working group consists of the same members of the Evangelism WG. If anyone is interested in becoming a member, by all means please participate and make contributions. If you have been making contributions and think perhaps you might not have been noticed in all the activity goes on, please go ahead and reach out to any of us. You can DM on Twitter. I see you've made several helpful comments so far, including in #118 (other than the fact you recommended n instead of nvm ... kidding)! :)

Any more questions, or can I close this?

@williamkapke
Copy link
Author

I'm working to get organizational things in order around the repos to make them easier to find & understand. Can you please add that info to the README? It would clear up questions/confusion for others that don't see this thread.

Also: We can battle out the n vs nvm when I see you next Tuesday night- oh wait, we got in to that @ the last Node Night! ;)

EDIT: Thought it was Wednesday!

@Fishrock123
Copy link

This is a "wg" in the loose sense. There's no significant decisions this group would ever be making outside of this repo that doesn't already belong to another team, like docs or website. I don't think chartering is necessary, and the group probably won't even have meetings, so there really isn't a point.

¯_(ツ)_/¯

@williamkapke
Copy link
Author

@Fishrock123 Sounds right to me! I do think it should link over to Evangelism for posterity though.

@SomeoneWeird
Copy link
Member

I'd love to join either this WG (if it is one haha) or the evangelism WG, keen to keep helping folks who are new like I do over with nodeschool :)

@Fishrock123
Copy link

Perhaps the list in the repo should be "who to mention", "helpers" or something?

@williamkapke
Copy link
Author

This has been resolved via #400

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants