-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
At the collaborator summit in Berlin, the behaviour of `worker.terminate()` was discussed. In particular, switching from a callback-based to a Promise-based API was suggested. While investigating that possibility later, it was discovered that `.terminate()` was unintentionally synchronous up until now (including calling its callback synchronously). Also, the topic of its stability has been brought up. I have performed two manual reviews of the native codebase for compatibility with `.terminate()`, and performed some manual fuzz testing with the test suite. At this point, bugs with `.terminate()` should, in my opinion, be treated like bugs in other Node.js features. (It is possible to make Node.js crash with `.terminate()` by messing with internals and/or built-in prototype objects, but that is already the case without `.terminate()` as well.) This commit: - Makes `.terminate()` an asynchronous operation. - Makes `.terminate()` return a `Promise`. - Runtime-deprecates passing a callback. - Removes a warning about its stability from the documentation. - Eliminates an unnecessary extra function from the C++ code. A possible alternative to returning a `Promise` would be to keep the method synchronous and just drop the callback. Generally, providing an asynchronous API does provide us with a bit more flexibility. Refs: openjs-foundation/summit#141 PR-URL: #28021 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
7 changed files
with
50 additions
and
23 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters