From 94c7406546d138a6692fd42ed19b94a399d56e10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Salman Shakeel <shakeels22@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:16:51 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] test: reversed actual and expected values for .strictEqual()

Fixed strictEqual() parameters order according to the documentation
for the assertion.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23579
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
---
 test/parallel/test-next-tick-ordering.js | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/parallel/test-next-tick-ordering.js b/test/parallel/test-next-tick-ordering.js
index 76f43efa932fbf..9ae212cb7f3fbe 100644
--- a/test/parallel/test-next-tick-ordering.js
+++ b/test/parallel/test-next-tick-ordering.js
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ console.log('Running from main.');
 
 
 process.on('exit', function() {
-  assert.strictEqual('nextTick', done[0]);
+  assert.strictEqual(done[0], 'nextTick');
   /* Disabling this test. I don't think we can ensure the order
   for (i = 0; i < N; i += 1) {
     assert.strictEqual(i, done[i + 1]);