You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a heads up, there's talk going on in the node issue tracker about ratifying the Docs WG. As part of this, we've landed on a working proposal for where the docs will live. It's similar to the original arrangement β the Docs WG will produce documentation for this WG to include β but instead of working within the nodejs/docs repo, the Docs WG will be working within the nodejs/node repo. This means that we can work to apply internationalization to the API docs as well. π
If you've been working on the docs and would like to become part of the Docs WG, please note your interest on this issue and we'll get you on board. There will be a meeting in late January to discuss the state of the proposal. You may want to take a gander at the contributing and getting-started docs, as well! They're not set in stone but they reflect the current ethos of the WG.
I'll close this issue in two weeks.
Thanks, all!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey all! π
As a heads up, there's talk going on in the node issue tracker about ratifying the Docs WG. As part of this, we've landed on a working proposal for where the docs will live. It's similar to the original arrangement β the Docs WG will produce documentation for this WG to include β but instead of working within the
nodejs/docs
repo, the Docs WG will be working within thenodejs/node
repo. This means that we can work to apply internationalization to the API docs as well. πIf you've been working on the docs and would like to become part of the Docs WG, please note your interest on this issue and we'll get you on board. There will be a meeting in late January to discuss the state of the proposal. You may want to take a gander at the contributing and getting-started docs, as well! They're not set in stone but they reflect the current ethos of the WG.
I'll close this issue in two weeks.
Thanks, all!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: