Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Icons are slightly off-color #458

Closed
silverwind opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 12 comments
Closed

Icons are slightly off-color #458

silverwind opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 12 comments

Comments

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

favicon.ico uses #7ebf42 while the link color on the site #80bd01. They are supposed to match, right?

@iancrowther
Copy link
Contributor

Good eye

@phillipj
Copy link
Member

They are supposed to match, right?

It would surprise me if it was made so deliberately. Good catch 👍

@stevemao
Copy link
Contributor

There might be other inconsistent colours. #367

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

This should only affect apple-touch-icon.png and favicon.ico from the looks of it, a simple hue-rotate could suffice. I'm not really adept in Photoshop, so if someone could take over this, I'd be grateful :)

@silverwind silverwind changed the title favicon.ico is slightly off-color Icons are slightly off-color Jan 11, 2016
@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

BTW: Is there an exact definition of the node.js green? Some sort of brand guideline? When I started the new website, I used the tone from the SVG version of the logo. Icons were taken from the original website as well.

So if it hasn't been done already, it would be good to define the "official" colors somewhere, also as reference for future design updates, prints, stickers, etc.

/cc @mikeal

@stevemao
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @fhemberger , it'll depend on nodejs/evangelism#179

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

@stevemao I'm talking about the current status, not future iterations (as there also is no time table defined yet). We could need a clear definition now, as other node-related projects, conferences, etc. may use the color scheme as well.

@bentinata
Copy link
Contributor

Like Ubuntu's Design Guideline? (I'm not affiliated with Canonical or others. It's because their color guides are nice.)

We can do like:

  • #83cd29 Main Green
  • #404137 Gray
  • #309045 Foundation Green (optional)
  • Could add JS yellow, or Foundation blue.

I'm not sure about Joyent related things. Until this day I'm still sticking to official guide. It says we must not change the color.

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

@bentinata Yes, exactly. This looks really great.

Regarding Joyent's "visual guidelines": I don't think a low res, low quality JPG embedded in a Word file, converted to PDF can seriously be used as any sort of color guideline. It would help to get the exact info from Joyent (or the designer of the logo) themselves.

@silverwind silverwind added design and removed good first issue Issues for newcomers labels Jan 13, 2016
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here's a screenshot from that design guide:

design-guide

Looks like it's something approximately to #8cc84c on o there, but JPG compression messed with heavily with that color, and the js part is a whole different shade. Not really a source we can work with.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeal Are you able to dig up a PDF or psd guidelines document, if one exists? (Or even point us to who to ask?)

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor Author

Accessibility (#501) dictates that we use a darker green on he links and buttons if we are to keep the white background. With a dark background there would of course be no concern, and we could make those colors match.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants