- Issues and Pull Requests
- Accepting Modifications
- Technologies Used in the Worker
- Code Editing
- Testing
- Remarks on Technologies Used
- Additional Clarification
This document contains information for Collaborators of the Node.js release worker project regarding maintaining code, documentation, and issues.
Collaborators should be familiar with the guidelines for new contributors in CONTRIBUTING.md
Courtesy should always be shown to individuals submitting issues and pull requests to the Node.js Release Worker project.
Collaborators should feel free to take full responsibility for managing issues and pull requests they feel qualified to handle, as long as this is done while being mindful of these guidelines, the opinions of other Collaborators and guidance of the Web Infrastructure Group.
Collaborators may close any issue or pull request they believe is not relevant to the future of the Node.js project. Where this is unclear, the issue should be left open for several days for additional discussion. Where this does not yield input from Node.js Collaborators or additional evidence that the issue has relevance, then the issue may be closed. Remember that issues can always be re-opened if necessary.
All code and documentation modifications should be performed via GitHub pull requests. Only the Web Infrastructure Team can merge their work and should do so carefully.
All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a Collaborator with sufficient expertise who can take full responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required for sign-off.
Pull Requests can only be merged after all CI Checks have passed.
In some cases, it may be necessary to summon a qualified Collaborator to a pull request for review by @-mention.
If you are unsure about the modification and are not prepared to take full responsibility for the change, defer to another Collaborator.
We recommend collaborators follow the guidelines on the Contributing Guide for reviewing and merging Pull Requests.
Collaborators may opt to elevate pull requests or issues to the group for discussion by mentioning @nodejs/web-infra. This should be done where a pull request:
- Has a significant impact on the codebase
- Is inherently controlversial; or
- Has failed to reach a consensus amongst the Collaborators who are actively participating in the discussion.
The Web Infrastructure should be the final arbiter where needed.
The Node.js Release Worker is built upon Cloudflare Workers and Cloudflare R2.
The Worker also uses several other Open Source libraries (not limited to) listed below:
- AWS S3 client is used for interacting with R2's S3 entrypoint.
- Handlebars.js is used for rendering templated pages.
- Sentry is used for error reporting.
- Zod is used for error reporting.
src/
- Workerscripts/
- Multi-purpose scriptstests/
- Tests for the worker
Each new feature or bug fix should be accompanied by a unit or E2E test (when valuable). We use Node's test runner and Miniflare for our E2E tests.
Unit Tests are fundamental to ensure that code changes do not disrupt the functionalities of the Worker:
- Unit Tests should be written as
.test.ts
files in the tests/unit/ directory. - They should cover utilities as well as any component that can be broken down and individually tested.
- We utilize Node's Test Runner and Assert APIs.
- External services used in the worker should be mocked with Undici. If the service cannot be mocked with Undici, it should be mocked with a HTTP server via Node's
createServer
API.
E2E Tests are fundamental to ensure that requests made to the worker behave as expected:
- E2E Tests should be written as
.test.ts
files in the tests/e2e/ directory. - They should cover the various contexts of a request that could be sent to the worker from an external client.
- We utilize Node's Test Runner and Assert APIs.
- A local version of the Worker is ran with Miniflare.
- Like Unit Tests, any external services should be mocked for these tests as well.
We chose Cloudflare Workers because it is mostly straight-forward, reliable, community-oriented, and the support backing it.
Cloudflare R2 was chosen for similar reasoning, but also noteably its integration with Workers along with no egress fees.
Cloudflare has also graciously provided the OpenJS Foundation with an Enterprise account in addition to supporting us with any technical issues or questions we have faced.
This refers to the singular server instance that hosted the release assets (binaries, docs, shasums) among other things. This Worker aims to replace that server when it comes to serving the release assets.
The bucket's file structure is a 1:1 mapping to the file structure of the release assets on the origin server.
The directory listing page is the only frontend page that the Worker serves non-statically. For simplicitly, it is a pre-compiled Handlebars template. Should any other pages be added to this worker, they should do the same unless a consensus is reached by the Collaborators.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to reach out in an Issue or the #r2-website-migration
channel in the OpenJS Foundation Slack.