You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
These could be great good first issues, but how do we decide which articles (if any) we actually want to RFC and bring into the website? Do we just make PRs for each article and review them individually?
#105 was a massive PR with multiple sections, which was decided to be reviewed piecemeal once merged, partly because of the extra effort that would be needed to split up the PR.
But that content was comparatively up-to-date. This content under discussion needs to be checked for relevance.
Pinging @amiller-gh for guidance on how this review would fit into the RFC process.
Yeah I was leaning towards individual PRs as well, since it seems a lot more manageable to review each article on its own for relevance and correctness.
This issue was raised in the nodejs.org repo about content that was submitted by Nodejitsu to the Node.js project (not Website Redesign specifically).
We have a RFC process for bringing in new content. The content has yet to be reviewed but I think it can be funnelled into our existing RFC process.
Interested reviewers would need to visit nodejs.org/en/knowledge:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: