-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Exclude more redundant files from the tarball #495
Comments
They are not necessarily redundant. All of my packages explicitly include these files, so that |
I just mentioned 2 files as an example. I'm not familiar with what is needed, so this issue is mostly for npm maintainers to have another look at the shipped files. |
That's up to them; npm itself shouldn't have an opinion here. |
If the npm maintainers don't know which files are needed, who does? |
Only the author of the package knows what files are needed, and the current status is that the author decides - via |
I don't see why we keep discussing this TBH. This is mostly a callout for npm developers to have a further look if there are more files that should be excluded from npm's own package like #461... If everything that's currently included is needed, then the issue can be closed. |
Sorry, that wasn’t clear to me from the issue title and OP. |
I mentioned this in #461 too
Now, I know the aforementioned files are not big, but IMO the tarball should be as slim as possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: