(Just having some fun!) I don't like your tone, friend

[cur33]

The readme says I can safely ignore this repo, but neither do I wish do ignore it nor do I wish to be safe about my ignorance, should I change my mind and select ignorance. I would suggest that you re-word this to be more inclusive of the nosier among us.

You can safely ignore this issue.

[cur33]

That label needs to be way more common

[nstickney]

#truth

[cur33]

Actually did manage to find another use of the wontfix label 😆 and I have to say I agree with him. Don’t see any real gain to differentiating between js and jsx files.

facebook/create-react-app#87 (comment)

[nstickney]

Yeah, I've seen wontfix in quite a few repositories, generally for stuff that is outside the scope of a project.

I do believe it is actually one of GitHub's preloaded tags for an issue.

[cur33]

Ah, that would make sense. I think the reason I like it so much is the phrasing. I understand its meaning and why it's the best solution to the out-of-scope problem, but I love how, rather than do something like just close it or mark it "not-a-problem", they use a phrase like "wontfix" that seems to imply that it is a problem, but they aren't gonna do nothin' about it. It comes across as sassy haha.

[nstickney]

Oh, I intend to sass, Mr. Rapp.