-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Ability to customize the Secret Variable name in the generated YAML #969
Comments
I wouldn't do this. It completely breaks the benefit of having an integrated way, where you can use Why not have two properties |
I mean if you take the actual sample above, I have organization wide variables that have specific naming which doesn't match how Nuke would auto generate the Secret name. In the case of something like an iOS build this significantly over complicates things. With something like what I have above you have the benefit of being able to control the name of the secret at the Job level without having to touch any code which is ultimately as it should be because the job simply needs to know what certificate am I using what profile am I using... it should not need to know about environments that the Target may be reused across. |
The Providing this feature out of the box, however, increases the complexity of other related features. For instance #959, would allow setting secrets from the CLI, but if environment keys were to be set in the attribute, that information would need to go into |
Sorry I just realized I only showed the C# side here... We're not talking about trying to change the parameter names used by Nuke... only providing a way that someone can optionally override the default name that is used when generating the yaml for GitHubActions or whatever CI platform. You'll notice in this example that where I just passed in the parameter name it continues to work as expected... where I have the equals syntax it overrides the default name of the Secret in the generated YAML... nothing actually changes about the way Nuke handles properties here. [WorkflowJob(
Name = MacCatalystBuild,
Image = HostedAgent.Mac,
InvokedTargets = new[] { nameof(IHazMacCatalystBuild.CompileMacCatalyst) },
ImportSecrets = new[]
{
nameof(IHazAppleCertificate.P12B64),
nameof(IHazAppleCertificate.P12Password),
nameof(IRestoreAppleProvisioningProfile.AppleIssuerId),
nameof(IRestoreAppleProvisioningProfile.AppleKeyId),
nameof(IRestoreAppleProvisioningProfile.AppleAuthKeyP8),
$"{nameof(IRestoreAppleProvisioningProfile.AppleProfileId)}=MACCATALYST_PROVISIONING_PROFILE"
})] - name: Run './build.sh CompileMacCatalyst'
run: ./build.sh CompileMacCatalyst
env:
P12B64: ${{ secrets.P12B64 }}
P12Password: ${{ secrets.P12PASSWORD }}
AppleIssuerId: ${{ secrets.APPLE_ISSUER_ID }}
AppleKeyId: ${{ secrets.APPLE_KEY_ID }}
AppleAuthKeyP8: ${{ secrets.APPLE_AUTH_KEY_P8 }}
AppleProfileId: ${{ secrets.MACCATALYST_PROVISIONING_PROFILE }} |
Re-read my last comment, that's still the culprit. |
Description
There may be times where it is prudent to reuse certain targets that make user of secret parameters. One such case could be for building an iOS App. This app may need to be built for a Dev/QA Environment where only a Development Code Signing Certificate is used along with a Development Provisioning Profile. Other jobs may need to reuse the same Target to build the iOS app only for release to the store with a different variable for the Production Cert/Profile.
As also shown in #968 the WorkflowJob from the Nuke.Maui repo implements this so that you can provide either just the name or the name of the parameter with the name of the secret to reference. Doing this allows us to reuse the same Targets while customizing which secrets we want to use for that job.
Usage Example
Alternative
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: