You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your attention and for asking! I don't have an exact schedule for the need, but I am likely to at least integrate this package via Integrals.jl for my package ComputerAdaptiveTesting.jl. The benefit would be mainly to offer more options to users of my package.
MonteCarloIntegration.jl already support QMC, but no longer supports newer versions of QuasiMonteCarlo.jl, which my package also uses directly for non-adaptive integration and to allow specific optimisations and caching, so it would be nice to use this package instead so I could also offer adaptive integration.
More generally, this may be the thing to bring things up to feature parity with MonteCarloIntegration.jl, which will allow it to be deprecated since it is not being actively developed at the moment. Hopefully this helps prioritise.
It looks like currently only RNG -based sampling is supported. As discussed in SciML/Integrals.jl#11 Cuba supports using QMC. It is also supported in https://github.com/ranjanan/MonteCarloIntegration.jl . Would it be possible to integrate this into MCIntegration.jl too?
You can use e.g. https://github.com/SciML/QuasiMonteCarlo.jl for a generic interface to different low-discrepancy sequences.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: