Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow Beep Speech Mode Pitch To Be Configured More Intuatively #10886

Open
NoahTCarver opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Allow Beep Speech Mode Pitch To Be Configured More Intuatively #10886

NoahTCarver opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@NoahTCarver
Copy link

NoahTCarver commented Mar 20, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I find NVDA's beep speech mode useful, however it's default pitch of 10000 Hz is almost painful for me. I understand that it--along with a few other "hidden" settings--can be changed from the Python console, however it would be more user-friendly for there to be a more intuitive , easily accessible way to change this setting.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add the ability to change the "beepSpeechModePitch" value from the advanced settings panel so that users can change this setting without needing to use the Python console.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • This setting could be placed in another panel, however the setting is already hidden and seems to be meant for people who know what they're doing.
  • The beep speech mode pitch default could be set at a lower value.

Additional context

N/A

@NoahTCarver NoahTCarver changed the title Allow Beep Speech Mode Pitch To Be Configured More INtuatively Allow Beep Speech Mode Pitch To Be Configured More Intuatively Mar 20, 2020
@DrSooom
Copy link

DrSooom commented Mar 20, 2020

Duplicate of issue #9206 and #9308.

@NoahTCarver
Copy link
Author

Duplicate of issue #9206 and #9308.

Didn't see that. IN that case, issue #9206 is exactly what I'm looking for, and it would make all of the hidden Python console settings available to boot.

@feerrenrut
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of issue #9206 and #9308.

Despite these issues seeming like duplicates I won't close this right now. There are subtle variations in what is being asked for. Since there are several issues asking for low priority but similar things, I think it will be worth looking at combining them together as part of a bigger project to reconsider defaults and how customizable this behavior is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants