Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deno Support for Packaging #503

Open
AndresPrez opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Deno Support for Packaging #503

AndresPrez opened this issue Sep 29, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request unlikely Feature we are unlikely to implement waiting for interest Waiting to see if there's strong community interest

Comments

@AndresPrez
Copy link

Deno is a A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript, which is becoming increasingly popular.

The problem is that it has limitations at the time of compiling into an executable

We would like to leverage oclif's package command to allow packaging of Deno projects.
@AndresPrez AndresPrez mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2022
Open
@mdonnalley mdonnalley added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 29, 2022
@git2gus
Copy link

git2gus bot commented Sep 29, 2022

This issue has been linked to a new work item: W-11830017

This was referenced Sep 29, 2022
Closed
Open
@XantreDev
Copy link

What are the progress on that? When can we run oclif with deno?)

@AndresPrez
Copy link
Author

Hopefully they're working on it. I made a PR for it but I couldn't get passed this signing point: #504 (comment)

@mdonnalley
Copy link
Contributor

Deno support is not currently on our roadmap because there's simply not enough demand for it and we (that is, Salesforce) don't have any plans on using deno for our own CLI.

Happy to reconsider it though if more people start asking for this.

@aelesbao
Copy link

I'm definitely interested in running oclif using a faster execution engine :)

@mdonnalley mdonnalley added waiting for interest Waiting to see if there's strong community interest unlikely Feature we are unlikely to implement labels Mar 5, 2024
@calebAtIspot
Copy link

because there's simply not enough demand for it

Note this is currently the second most voted feature by 👍 's

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request unlikely Feature we are unlikely to implement waiting for interest Waiting to see if there's strong community interest
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@aelesbao @mdonnalley @AndresPrez @XantreDev @calebAtIspot