forked from morganericsson/EDA397
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Post mortem Report
Magnus Ågren edited this page May 11, 2016
·
13 revisions
You should conduct a post mortem analysis of the project as a group assignment. Based on this analysis, you shall submit a group report. Focus on the following:
- Which processes and practices did you use in your project?
- Approximately, how much time was spent (in total and by each group member) on the steps/activities involved as well as for the project as a whole?
- For each of the techniques and practices used in your project you should answer all the questions:
- What was the advantage of this technique based on your experience in this assignment?
- What was the disadvantage of this technique based on your experience in this assignment?
- How efficient was the technique given the time it took to use?
- In which situations would you use this technique in a future project?
- In which situations would you not use this technique in a future project?
- If you had the practice/technique in a part of the project and not the entire project, how was using it compared to not using it?
- Compared to other projects using a more plan-driven/waterfall process what were the benefits and drawbacks with the process used in this project?
- What worked well in how you worked in this project?
- What did not work well in how you worked in this project?
- How did you work together as a group in the project? What worked and not in your interaction(s)?
- What would you do differently in a future but similar project?
Please send your report to your agile coach (i.e. Terese or Magnus; CC to Eric) via email during the last lecture week, at latest Sunday 2016-05-29 23:59. Use your group number as filename (e.g., group-17.pdf). The report should have 5-15 pages and conform to the IEEE Formatting Guidelines. All submissions must be in PDF format.