Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A better way for test program saving is necessary #85

Closed
akamya997 opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

A better way for test program saving is necessary #85

akamya997 opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@akamya997
Copy link
Contributor

In the building of the judger, some test programs are built to test it. However, some libraries are necessary for this process, while some binary files are built locally for it.

In fact, all these test files are redundant for this repository. We need to find a way so that it can be well maintained, which means that:

  • Do not store the binary files in the repository.
  • Do not store the testlib.h library in the repository.
  • The testing process of the judger can be done smoothly both in developing environment and github ci workflow.

Meanwhile, I hope that it is easy to build the development environment from scratch.

Some changes may be applied to the test-program folder.

@akamya997 akamya997 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 24, 2023
@slhmy
Copy link
Member

slhmy commented Apr 25, 2023

test-program is supposed to be moved into https://github.com/OJ-lab/judger-test-collection.

@akamya997
Copy link
Contributor Author

The structure now seems enough for developing, thanks for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants