Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support AttributeConsumingServiceIndex in AuthnRequest #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2014
Merged

Support AttributeConsumingServiceIndex in AuthnRequest #132

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2014

Conversation

sebastienluquet
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate #95 but with rebased code

As far as I can tell it currently isn't possible to set AttributeConsumingServiceIndex=some_value for an AuthnRequest, as I only see a mention of AttributeConsumingServiceIndex in the saml20protocol_schema.xsd.

I guess this could be implemented in a manner similar to IsPassive in 8a825f3 or #92 ?

@Lordnibbler
Copy link
Contributor

This seems ok to me, any thoughts @cgthornt ?

@cthornton
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah looks good to me!

@cthornton
Copy link
Contributor

However, might it be a good idea to document this in the README file?

@Lordnibbler
Copy link
Contributor

@sebastienluquet any chance you could update readme.md with this change?

@sebastienluquet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

@sebastienluquet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should I submit another pull request or could you merge this one with my update on readme (I push --force) ?

@sebastienluquet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could this patch be merged. I'm leaving my current job and I would prefer giving posterity a Gemfile using upstream master than some nasty fork

Lordnibbler added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Support AttributeConsumingServiceIndex in AuthnRequest
@Lordnibbler Lordnibbler merged commit f85888e into SAML-Toolkits:master Jun 25, 2014
@Lordnibbler Lordnibbler mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants