ISO 11010-2

[jdsika]

General

This discussion should be a continuing thread about the harmonization with ISO 11010-2. In my eyes we are early adopters and can provide valuable feedback through @LukasElster to the ISO group. We should collect different topics

Tags

I am quoting from Lukas here for the first topic:

So far the taxonomy defined in the workgroup is:

Model Type <IR> / <CM> / <MF> / <CF> / <OR>

where

    <IR> is Input Resolution
    <CM> is Channel Model
    <MF> is Model Fidelity
    <CF> is Controller Fidelity
    <OR> is Output Resolution

Each Placeholder is replaced with a number which has a defined meaning.
Video Camera (VM), Radar (RM), Lidar (LM) and none technology specific
sensor models (xM) would be inserted for the model type.

Therefore a classification of our radar model would look like

    RM 3 / 2 / 3 / 2 / 1

or if we don't take the numbers but the corresponding meaning out of the ISO, then it would look like

RM Reflection / Integrated in sensor model / Phenomenological / SiL, Target ASW / Object

I personally think that this taxonomy is not suitable to create a better understanding of the model by using it for e.g. the name of the model and in our case the repository name. It might be on the other hand suitable to use them as tags and we could integrate them as protected tags in the .github repository.

Protected tags

Protected tags can only be created or deleted by users with enhanced permissions defined by your organization owners. Learn more about protected tags.

TODOs

• Add protected tags when ISO group has finalized them.
• @LukasElster reports about the changes and we provide feedback