Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

Feature Request - Provide alternative to datatype flattened #523

Open
JasonLaquaTR opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Feature Request - Provide alternative to datatype flattened #523

JasonLaquaTR opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@JasonLaquaTR
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Missing efficient datatype like flattened

Describe the solution you'd like
Implement something similar to flattened that elastic search has

Describe alternatives you've considered
Some other datatype that accomplishes the same things as flattened

Additional context
Flattened is extremely useful to prevent mapping explosion and performance constraints of something like nested

@JasonLaquaTR JasonLaquaTR added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 21, 2020
@peterzhuamazon peterzhuamazon changed the title Provide alternative to datatype flattened Feature Request - Provide alternative to datatype flattened Jan 5, 2021
@stockholmux
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrkamel
Copy link

mrkamel commented Mar 28, 2021

and in aws forums https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=329703 this feature would be highly appreciated

@aparo
Copy link

aparo commented Apr 7, 2021

I created a flattened field replacer for Elastic flattened field.
The project is here https://github.com/aparo/opendistro-flattened-mapper-plugin .
I tested with two Elastic => Opendistro clusters without issues.

@chipzzz
Copy link

chipzzz commented Dec 15, 2021

@aparo this link no longer there https://github.com/aparo/opensearch-flattened-mapper-plugin :(

@daskanu
Copy link

daskanu commented Mar 4, 2022

Any update on this? Datatype 'flattened' would be really helpful for us.

@2arunpmohan
Copy link

any news on this issue

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants