-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Let's have a wrapper around libsolc #8
Comments
where does one find libsolidity? a google search didn't bring up any meaningful results |
@snd I referred to this: https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/tree/develop/libsolidity |
I'd strongly suggest a wrapper around https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/tree/develop/libsolc (it makes sense with #25) if you really want to go ahead with an unsupported method at the moment - which is binding to the sources directly. |
@axic while we have you here, maybe you can share you opinion about what's most likely to go wrong if we bind directly to the compiler sources? PS. Thanks for correcting me about |
personally i don't think shelling out to the compiler is much of a problem
that could be great. |
@kirushik sorry didn't see this ping :( Nothing should go wrong really and that API is meant to be stable (but of course no guarantees on that!), however since we don't ship official releases of |
It will allow us to compile contracts (and extract ABIs) without any need to shell-out to the compiler.
Also will allow some advanced instumentation techniques (like custom opcodes maybe?) for #7
UPD: renamed the issue to follow the @axic suggestion about wrapping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: