You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Throughout the works in the OIDF GAIN PoC WG, I came to the idea that obtaining an access token along with the verifiable presentation can be an useful use case in the context of decentralized identity. The point of the design would be to have a code vp_token or token vp_token response type to request both access and identity information in the same flow.
One of the missing parts would a parameter here called relying_party_redirect_uri that would help the relying party to trigger an OID4VP flow from the authorization server and get a response with the access_token and the vp_token. That would help to have the verifier uncoupled from the application that requires the identity information.
I drafted the following sequence diagram and a working proof of concept (malach-it/boruta-server#66) that showcase how it would look like.
I raised this issue to gather feedback about the concept and know if I am mistaken somewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Throughout the works in the OIDF GAIN PoC WG, I came to the idea that obtaining an access token along with the verifiable presentation can be an useful use case in the context of decentralized identity. The point of the design would be to have a
code vp_token
ortoken vp_token
response type to request both access and identity information in the same flow.One of the missing parts would a parameter here called
relying_party_redirect_uri
that would help the relying party to trigger an OID4VP flow from the authorization server and get a response with the access_token and the vp_token. That would help to have the verifier uncoupled from the application that requires the identity information.I drafted the following sequence diagram and a working proof of concept (malach-it/boruta-server#66) that showcase how it would look like.
I raised this issue to gather feedback about the concept and know if I am mistaken somewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: