-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Giga Connectome: a BIDS-app for time series and functional connectome extraction #6630
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@htwangtw Dear author, thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. Before we proceed, please can you have a look at the following points:
Note I've also added the query scope label. This is because I need some help from the editorial board to determine if this work is in scope for JOSS. This mainly relates to the size of this work in terms of number of lines of code. The scope review by the editorial board will check if this conforms to our substantial scholarly effort criteria, and should take about 2 weeks to complete. |
Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman the flagged paper is a registered report hence there's no doi yet. I can ask the author to see what's possible. |
@htwangtw that's okay. If it currently has no DOI you can leave it without. Perhaps instead add a URL if you haven't already. Thanks |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman The added URL will be online by Thursday as OSF requires 48 hours to verify. |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman all that I can do on my side are good. Are we just waiting on the assessment of scope now? |
@htwangtw yes we were waiting for the scope review. We've just concluded the review and I can share that is was determined this work may be in scope for JOSS. As such I will proceed to find a handing editor. |
@htwangtw I've just waitlisted this submission since all editors in this domain are currently handling other submissions. We will assign an editor as soon as one becomes available. Thanks for your patience. |
@editorialbot invite @spholmes as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Sorry @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I have to decline. I just recieved three requests for reviews in the next few weeks and now traveling, so I have to pass on this one which is quite far from my expertise. |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman We can extend to the Social, Behavioral, and Cognitive Sciences topic for potential editor, if that helps! |
@htwangtw unfortunately all editors, including the that domain, are busy. I'll assign one as soon as one becomes available. Apologies for the delay so far. |
@editorialbot invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot invite @mstimberg as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign me as editor Happy to edit this submission! |
Assigned! @mstimberg is now the editor |
👋 @htwangtw I will be the editor for your submission, looking forward to working with you again (you were a reviewer for a submission I edited 😊 ). |
Thanks @htwangtw, this gives me plenty to work with. |
Hi folks, thanks for the offer. I would love to review this submission but unfortunately, my schedule is rather packed until mid-July and thus, Thanks and sorry again. Best, Peer |
@editorialbot add @jdkent as reviewer Thanks a lot for helping out! |
@jdkent added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @shnizzedy as reviewer Many thanks for joining us! |
@shnizzedy added to the reviewers list! |
@htwangtw Apologies again for the long delay in finding reviewers – it doesn't take that long usually… But I am very happy to have @jdkent and @shnizzedy on board, looking forward to a smooth and constructive reviewing process! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7061. |
Submitting author: @htwangtw (Hao-Ting Wang)
Repository: https://github.com/bids-apps/giga_connectome
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.5.0
Editor: @mstimberg
Reviewers: @jdkent, @shnizzedy
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @htwangtw. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@htwangtw if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: