Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which targets are needed? #21

Open
uliska opened this issue Jun 10, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Which targets are needed? #21

uliska opened this issue Jun 10, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@uliska
Copy link
Contributor

uliska commented Jun 10, 2017

We need to decide what target formats the documentation should eventually address.

  • Individual package's documentation vs. full openLilyLib
  • Set of HTML pages
  • Interactive web application (Single page with live update of displayed content)?

How can we make the documentation available to, say, Frescobaldi, both for a documentation browser, maybe editor tooltip and code completion? Maybe that's more an issue of the intermediate representation to draw from.

Blocks #26

@Cecca
Copy link

Cecca commented Jun 11, 2017

Some thoughts on the sources/targets listed above

  • Individual package's documentation vs. full openLilyLib

I think that the basic documentation generation tool should be targeted at individual packages, since openLilyLib will eventually turn into a curated collection of related packages, as far as I understood. Possibly, the basic mechanism of extracting documentation for lilypond files could be decoupled to openLilyLib: this way a user can document his own custom files for reference without the need to turn them into full-featured openLilyLib packages.

  • Set of HTML pages

This might be the default output format. Anyway, if we go for an intermediate representation we can have several output formats, as you are already suggesting.
The intermediate representation could also enable a tighter integration with Frescobaldi, but I'm not familiar with that codebase, so I have no idea of what are the possibilities.

  • Interactive web application (Single page with live update of displayed content)?

I don't see the benefits of a single page web application with respect to a set of static HTML pages. Anyway, having an intermediate representation would enable also to have such an application.

@uliska
Copy link
Contributor Author

uliska commented Jun 11, 2017

I think that the basic documentation generation tool should be targeted at individual packages, since openLilyLib will eventually turn into a curated collection of related packages, as far as I understood.

Yes, that's right. One should also consider the option that a package maintainer wants to display his package's documentation on his own website.

So what we need is a single-package target, but keeping in mind that there will be a complete openLilyLib documentation somewhere that needs to stitch all the packages together.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants