Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NEXRAD Support #40

Open
1 of 2 tasks
mgrover1 opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Add NEXRAD Support #40

mgrover1 opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator

mgrover1 commented Oct 21, 2022

Description

Add a backend for NEXRAD level 2 and level 3 files

What We Want to Do

NEXRAD data is heavily used within the radar community, and it would be helpful to have a reader for this data in xradar.

Py-ART has readers for this, including the

@jthielen mentioned he would be interested in helping with this (see #27)... others can help too!

@mgrover1 mgrover1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 21, 2022
@mgrover1 mgrover1 mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2022
8 tasks
@jthielen
Copy link

@jthielen mentioned they would be interested in helping with this (see #27)... others can help too!

Yes indeed! I still hope to get around to implementing the Level 2 reader, but if someone beats me to it, that'd work too! Also, I wouldn't have need for the Level 3 reader in my own work, so I will refrain from taking on that one.

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jthielen any updates here? If not, I can go ahead and start drafting something

@jthielen
Copy link

@jthielen any updates here? If not, I can go ahead and start drafting something

Thanks for the ping! My work on this has unfortunately stalled recently due a few other things taking higher priority, but I can least share what I've got so far: https://github.com/jthielen/xradar/tree/nexrad-level2. Currently, a majority (but certainly not all) of the file reader is implemented (what remains has TODO comments), whereas the backend entrypoint isn't (but should be much easier than the file reader to code). Feel free to take what I have as a starting point to build off of if you'd want this to progress sooner rather than later, otherwise, I believe I should have the chance to return to this in mid-March.

@mgrover1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No worries @jthielen - thank you for the quick response. I totally understand!

I will take a look at the progress you have made so far!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants