Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Star Tree [OnHeap] Min and Max Value Aggregators #14624

Closed
sarthakaggarwal97 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14625
Closed

[Feature Request] Star Tree [OnHeap] Min and Max Value Aggregators #14624

sarthakaggarwal97 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14625
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance RFC Issues requesting major changes v2.17.0

Comments

@sarthakaggarwal97
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Currently, there is not a way to introduce min and max value aggregation for the tracked metrics in Star Trees.

Describe the solution you'd like

Min and Max Value Aggregation for Star Tree

Related component

Indexing:Performance

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

#14512

@sarthakaggarwal97 sarthakaggarwal97 added enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request untriaged labels Jul 2, 2024
@sarthakaggarwal97 sarthakaggarwal97 self-assigned this Jul 2, 2024
@sarthakaggarwal97 sarthakaggarwal97 added v2.16.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.16.0 RFC Issues requesting major changes labels Jul 10, 2024
@bharath-techie bharath-techie added v2.17.0 and removed v2.16.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.16.0 labels Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance RFC Issues requesting major changes v2.17.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants