Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amenity=parking: missing access=yes #4383

Closed
ghost opened this issue Oct 2, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

amenity=parking: missing access=yes #4383

ghost opened this issue Oct 2, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 2, 2017

access=yes, used to tag public car parks (see Wiki), is missing for amenity=parking:

screen shot 2017-10-02 at 10 33 51

Thanks for adding it.

Edit: I just noticed that access=yes is missing for amenity=bicycle_parking, too.

@bhousel bhousel closed this as completed in a20cc8e Oct 2, 2017
@bhousel
Copy link
Member

bhousel commented Oct 2, 2017

We used to have separate fields for toilets, which included a yes option (previously public) vs. other simple fields like parking and swimming pools, which did not include yes option.

I just added the yes option to access_simple.json and removed the special access_toilets.json field - so now all the simple access fields use the same list. I think the tagging has standardized enough that this is fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant