Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use docusaurus? #24

Open
alex-dixon opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Use docusaurus? #24

alex-dixon opened this issue Jan 4, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@alex-dixon
Copy link
Contributor

Curious if there's any interest in switching to this:
https://docusaurus.io/

@WilliamParker
Copy link
Collaborator

This is the first I've heard of the Docusaurus project.

Is there something that it does that you think would be valuable on clara-site that the existing setup doesn't support? Alternatively, is the existing setup with GitHub pages not supportable long-term in some way e.g. if the pages gem was no longer being maintained?

I wouldn't rule out switching the way the site is built if there is a sufficiently motivating reason to do so, but at the moment I'm not aware of such a reason. To be honest, my personal assessment is that the biggest shortcomings of clara-site right now pertain to a lack of content in some areas rather than the infrastructure of the site itself, and so when I have time to improve the docs that's what I'm more likely to work on.

@alex-dixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Look and feel like other popular open source projects, next to free to set up, and potentially easier to maintain and contribute to, built in mobile / responsive support, blog, auto translate to 70 languages.

I dunno if it’s even something I could help deliver in the short term but I like the feeling I get when thinking of Clara having the same look and feel as React, Relay and others. So, branding I guess? 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants