Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cluster Level OCI Authentication Provider(aka Multitenancy support) #203

Closed
shyamradhakrishnan opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #207
Closed

Cluster Level OCI Authentication Provider(aka Multitenancy support) #203

shyamradhakrishnan opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #207
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@shyamradhakrishnan
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to be added:
Users should be able to specify different user principals per cluster.

Why is this needed:
In some large organisations, a single management cluster may be shared across multiple smaller teams and even tenancies. Hence each team may like to use its own user credentials for the workload cluster they create.

@shyamradhakrishnan shyamradhakrishnan added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 17, 2023
@shyamradhakrishnan shyamradhakrishnan self-assigned this Jan 17, 2023
@shyamradhakrishnan shyamradhakrishnan changed the title Cluster Level Authentication Provider(aka Multi-Tenancy support) Cluster Level Authentication Provider(aka Multitenancy support) Jan 17, 2023
@shyamradhakrishnan shyamradhakrishnan changed the title Cluster Level Authentication Provider(aka Multitenancy support) Cluster Level OCI Authentication Provider(aka Multitenancy support) Jan 17, 2023
@joekr
Copy link
Member

joekr commented Jan 17, 2023

Is this a duplicate of #180 ?

@shyamradhakrishnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

shyamradhakrishnan commented Jan 18, 2023

Slightly different from 180, that is a bug because instance principal does not support multi tenancy support right now, this ons is supporting multitenancy using user principal. Edited the issue #180 to be clear.

@shyamradhakrishnan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed via attached PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants