Pick a journal for CF roadmap #354
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sadielbartholomew @efisher008 and I met today and reviewed the excellent work that @feggleton had posted previously. Thanks @feggleton your work made our lives easy. We're not quite finished but have managed to throw all of the journals into a sorting hat and make some sort of order out of it. We've reviewed the journals based on their publication type; next week we'll review based on "Notes on fit" and also come to the next meeting having looked at the journals that we currently think are interesting candidates. @efisher008 will set the next meeting to take place next week. Thumbs up if you want to be on the invite - see you there! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Topic for discussion
@sadielbartholomew @efisher008 @feggleton
This is for us to follow up on picking a journal.
By end of October we should have shortlist with pros and cons. We should propose this to the community and if we have a clear winner put that one forward; otherwise we might use the upvote/downvote mechanism to decide amongst equals. I have an opinion here but won't be too pushy about it ;)
I massaged ChatGPT to do some initial analysis of the journals we spoke about in the meeting. Here are the results:
Journals discussed but not included:
Instinctinvely I like ESSD, it's open access and seems to be a good fit - but I'm not sure as we're not publishing data, but rather a metadata standard. So it may not be such a great fit in the end.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions