You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On README, if possible please include details on overhead, performance related information. Is using Standalone Logger library more performant than using it with Timber and Logger integration. Please add info with reason.
Also, is Logger standalone and Timber and Logger integration more performant than Timber standalone?
I understand the usecase is to make Logs beautiful. But this information would be useful as well. If its not possible to include in README, please add here.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
donenoyes
changed the title
Request to add information on the overhead of using logger library standalong and with Timber integration
Request to add information on the overhead of using logger library standalone and with Timber integration
Jun 21, 2021
On README, if possible please include details on overhead, performance related information. Is using Standalone Logger library more performant than using it with Timber and Logger integration. Please add info with reason.
Also, is Logger standalone and Timber and Logger integration more performant than Timber standalone?
I understand the usecase is to make Logs beautiful. But this information would be useful as well. If its not possible to include in README, please add here.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: