Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add CI job against GAP master #995
Add CI job against GAP master #995
Changes from 15 commits
9b7bec4
8e25c7a
be70ccb
8aef207
7c95b1d
8d484ab
2b0fdfc
84a46d6
2a85cbe
d3b566a
c5d751c
fad961c
db25a37
c6b3314
4c85966
5a3b2bc
d61e12a
f9756a4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changed order of additions makes a little bit faster to precompile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This threw some (seemingly random) segfaults with nightly. But only if running from the console, not if copying everything to the reply.
Thus I took the easy solution and added the UUID to the arguments instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just tried with Julia master and when running this code I actually got
which would suggest
pkgid === nothing
, but then also thetouch
below would be borked?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you print the pkgid, this succeeds (and prints something non-trivial), but i then get a segfault instead of a LoadError when accessing pkgid.uuid
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed: printing the
pkgid
makes it proceed -- that seems like a big regression in Julia, printing a value shouldn't change it formnothing
to something, should it? In particular since this works in the REPL (without printing):Perhaps we should open an issue?
Anyway, so I inserted the
print
and it proceeds, but I don't get a crash, I get this:which makes no sense, as we run
Pkg.instantiate()
. But I've inserted anotherPkg.instantiate()
invocation right after theadd_jll_override
calls.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for reporting it upstream, it seems we've hit an IMHO rather serious looking code generation bug in Julia.
For now we can keep this workaround, but let's remove it again when they fix their bug.