A better way of telegraphing which files are processed by oxc_ast_codegen

[rzvxa]

Copied from #4696 (comment)

Great to have these types included in schema.
Personally I wouldn't have split the types into a separate file. Is the rationale for that to give the codegen less code to chew through looking for items with an #[ast] attr? If so, I wouldn't worry too much about that - the file is not so large, and it's no big deal if the codegen isn't quite as quick as it could be.

I intentionally panic on unrelated items in the source read by codegen. It isn't for performance purposes, I don't care for performance in the codegen.

It lowers the clutter in the rust definition files, I would even suggest going as far as changing the file extension to something like XXX.d.rs. Otherwise, we have no way of reasoning about what is and isn't included in the codegen(unless you read the source code).

[rzvxa]

Close in favor of oxc-project/backlog#124 , If we find that approach bad for compile times we can reopen this.