Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider reducing fee for submitting valid finality proofs. #954

Closed
tomusdrw opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider reducing fee for submitting valid finality proofs. #954

tomusdrw opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
A-feat New feature or request P-Runtime
Milestone
Nice to Have (2021)

Comments

@tomusdrw
Copy link
Contributor

tomusdrw commented May 3, 2021

Currently calling pallet_bridge_grandpa::submit_finality_proof requires the relayer to pay full cost of the transaction.
We may consider reducing these costs (maybe even to 0), under some very detailed assumptions (modelling required):

  1. The finality proofs are correct & useful.
  2. The finality proofs are within expected rate (i.e. the cost should be larger for submitting them too often).
@tomusdrw tomusdrw added this to the Nice to Have milestone May 3, 2021
@svyatonik svyatonik mentioned this issue Aug 25, 2023
Open
@svyatonik
Copy link
Contributor

I think we may close it now, after #1127 ? Please reopen if you think we should also reduce fee for non-mandatory submissions

svyatonik pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2023
@NachoPal @chevdor
Update command for running benchmarks (#954)
43b427d 
* Update command for running benchmarks

* add --locked

Co-authored-by: Chevdor <chevdor@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Chevdor <chevdor@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-feat New feature or request P-Runtime
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Nice to Have (2021)
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tomusdrw @svyatonik