Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove usage of AccountKeyring #5858

Open
2 tasks done
programskillforverification opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #5899
Open
2 tasks done

Remove usage of AccountKeyring #5858

programskillforverification opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #5899
Labels
I5-enhancement An additional feature request.

Comments

@programskillforverification
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an existing issue?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Experiencing problems? Have you tried our Stack Exchange first?

  • This is not a support question.

Motivation

https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/master/substrate/primitives/keyring/src/lib.rs#L34
Compared with AccountKeyring, Sr25519Keyring and Ed25519Keyring are more intuitive.
When both Sr25519Keyring and Ed25519Keyring are required, using AccountKeyring bring confusion. There are two AccountKeyring definitions, it becomes more complex if export two AccountKeyring from frame.

Request

remove all AccountKeyring, re-export Sr25519Keyring and Ed25519Keyring from frame so that don't need extra use sp-keyring

Solution

No response

Are you willing to help with this request?

Yes!

@programskillforverification programskillforverification added the I5-enhancement An additional feature request. label Sep 27, 2024
@bkontur
Copy link
Contributor

bkontur commented Sep 27, 2024

Do you plan to do it as a part of #5804?

@programskillforverification
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you plan to do it as a part of #5804?

Yes.

@kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

If it is going to be part of the PR, I suggest either not creating a new issue that is going to be immediately closed, or please semantically link this issue to 5804 so that it will get closed when the PR is merged.

@programskillforverification
Copy link
Contributor Author

If it is going to be part of the PR, I suggest either not creating a new issue that is going to be immediately closed, or please semantically link this issue to 5804 so that it will get closed when the PR is merged.

I see. Now, maybe I plan to create new PR due to effect too many files.

@programskillforverification programskillforverification linked a pull request Oct 2, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I5-enhancement An additional feature request.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants