Heisenberg's uncertainty principle affects the impartiality of a circuit simulator's perspective.

[Vinyasi]

In other words, an observer can affect the outcome of whatever is under observation based on the participation of the observer merely functioning as an observer -- but as an observer, making certain presumptions presupposing the observation (affecting the outcome), such as choosing a periodic time interval.

The injection of a periodic time interval into the simulation of a circuit is the injection of a potential form of energy which contributes to the kinetic energy of the circuit under investigation. -- Podbean

A shorter time interval equates to the contribution of a higher frequency causing some circuits to accelerate the accumulation of voltage and current at one proportionality or another.

In fact, higher frequencies are equivalent to shorting a circuit (according to artificial intelligence, online).

If the time interval is not periodic, if it is not consistently matching the wavelength of a specific frequency, then it cannot contribute any appreciable amplitude of a potential form of energy (in the format of a specific frequency) affecting the outcome of the simulation. But it can affect the look-ahead perspective of the SPICE family of simulators who vary their time intervals during runtime.

Some circuit archetypes are notably affected by the time interval...

https://www.protosimulator.com/share?workspace=workspace_f55c7015-5949-4d74-8c18-7ef7fec7fb93_1735014656010

While other circuit archetypes are not affected. They simply get results sooner at a higher interval or take longer to arrive at the same or similar results at lower intervals of time step, such as: in this example...

https://tinyurl.com/infinitewatts3 >>> 3.19e278 amperes of non-oscillating D/C current (that's 278 decimal place-values to the left of the decimal point) is ultimately pulled from out of the ground in less than 50 milliseconds initiated by an input voltage of 1e-25VDC (that's 25 decimal place-values to the right of the decimal point) while running the simulation at a 500 nanosecond time interval.

In the first example (at protosimulator.com), there's no constant source of input to override the contribution which a potential reactive source of energy (in the format of a consistent time interval) could have in contributing to the kinetic energy of the circuit. In that example, the energy is only momentarily provided because the snap switch pops back open and blocks the constant source of current which could have come from the voltage source had the switch remained closed all the time.

In the second example (at falstad.com), there's a constant source of input from the antenna which overrides the contribution which a potential reactive source of energy (in the format of a consistent time interval) could have in contributing to the kinetic energy of the circuit.

To protect the voltage source from becoming damaged, it's possible to eliminate it by providing a precharged condition on both of the micro Farad capacitors in the upper-right and lower-left corners of the schematic...

https://tinyurl.com/4to1amps2volts

In an attempt to prevent war between countries over their limited sources of fuel for heating water to its boiling point (for the purpose of making steam to rotate a turbine which is connected to a rotary electric generator), resistive heating elements could be employed to drain the buildup of reactive power by converting it into real power through a resistive load.

https://tinyurl.com/infinitewatts2boilwater