title | summary | aliases | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Constraints |
Learn how SQL Constraints apply to TiDB. |
|
TiDB supports almost the same constraints as MySQL.
NOT NULL constraints supported by TiDB are the same as those supported by MySQL.
For example:
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
age INT NOT NULL,
last_login TIMESTAMP
);
INSERT INTO users (id,age,last_login) VALUES (NULL,123,NOW());
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
INSERT INTO users (id,age,last_login) VALUES (NULL,NULL,NOW());
ERROR 1048 (23000): Column 'age' cannot be null
INSERT INTO users (id,age,last_login) VALUES (NULL,123,NULL);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec)
- The first
INSERT
statement succeeds because it is possible to assignNULL
to theAUTO_INCREMENT
column. TiDB generates sequence numbers automatically. - The second
INSERT
statement fails because theage
column is defined asNOT NULL
. - The third
INSERT
statement succeeds because thelast_login
column is not explicitly defined asNOT NULL
. NULL values are allowed by default.
Note:
The
CHECK
constraint feature is disabled by default. To enable it, you need to set thetidb_enable_check_constraint
variable toON
.
A CHECK
constraint restricts the values of a column in a table to meet your specified conditions. When the CHECK
constraint is added to a table, TiDB checks whether the constraint is satisfied during the insertion or updates of data into the table. If the constraint is not met, an error is returned.
The syntax for the CHECK
constraint in TiDB is the same as that in MySQL:
[CONSTRAINT [symbol]] CHECK (expr) [[NOT] ENFORCED]
Syntax explanation:
[]
: the content within[]
is optional.CONSTRAINT [symbol]
: specifies the name of theCHECK
constraint.CHECK (expr)
: specifies the constraint condition, whereexpr
needs to be a boolean expression. For each row in the table, the calculation result of this expression must be one ofTRUE
,FALSE
, orUNKNOWN
(forNULL
values). If the calculation result isFALSE
for a row, it indicates that the constraint is violated.[NOT] ENFORCED
: specifies whether to implement the constraint check. You can use it to enable or disable aCHECK
constraint.
In TiDB, you can add a CHECK
constraint to a table using either the CREATE TABLE
or the ALTER TABLE
statement.
-
Example of adding a
CHECK
constraint using theCREATE TABLE
statement:CREATE TABLE t(a INT CHECK(a > 10) NOT ENFORCED, b INT, c INT, CONSTRAINT c1 CHECK (b > c));
-
Example of adding a
CHECK
constraint using theALTER TABLE
statement:ALTER TABLE t ADD CONSTRAINT CHECK (1 < c);
When adding or enabling a CHECK
constraint, TiDB checks the existing data in the table. If any data violates the constraint, the operation of adding the CHECK
constraint will fail and return an error.
When adding a CHECK
constraint, you can either specify a constraint name or leave the name unspecified. If no constraint name is specified, TiDB automatically generates a constraint name in the <tableName>_chk_<1, 2, 3...>
format.
You can view the constraint information in a table using the SHOW CREATE TABLE
statement. For example:
SHOW CREATE TABLE t;
+-------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Table | Create Table |
+-------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| t | CREATE TABLE `t` (
`a` int DEFAULT NULL,
`b` int DEFAULT NULL,
`c` int DEFAULT NULL,
CONSTRAINT `c1` CHECK ((`b` > `c`)),
CONSTRAINT `t_chk_1` CHECK ((`a` > 10)) /*!80016 NOT ENFORCED */,
CONSTRAINT `t_chk_2` CHECK ((1 < `c`))
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin |
+-------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
When deleting a CHECK
constraint, you need to specify the name of the constraint to be deleted. For example:
ALTER TABLE t DROP CONSTRAINT t_chk_1;
When adding a CHECK
constraint to a table, you can specify whether TiDB needs to implement the constraint check during data insertion or updates.
- If
NOT ENFORCED
is specified, TiDB does not check the constraint conditions during data insertion or updates. - If
NOT ENFORCED
is not specified orENFORCED
is specified, TiDB checks the constraint conditions during data insertion or updates.
In addition to specifying [NOT] ENFORCED
when adding the constraint, you can also enable or disable a CHECK
constraint using the ALTER TABLE
statement. For example:
ALTER TABLE t ALTER CONSTRAINT c1 NOT ENFORCED;
- It is not supported to add a
CHECK
constraint while adding a column (for example,ALTER TABLE t ADD COLUMN a CHECK(a > 0)
). In this case, only the column is added successfully, and TiDB ignores theCHECK
constraint without reporting any error. - It is not supported to use
ALTER TABLE t CHANGE a b int CHECK(b > 0)
to add aCHECK
constraint. When this statement is executed, TiDB reports an error.
Unique constraints mean that all non-null values in a unique index and a primary key column are unique.
By default, for optimistic transactions, TiDB checks unique constraints lazily in the execution phase and strictly in the commit phase, which helps reduce network overhead and improve performance.
For example:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS users;
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
username VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL,
UNIQUE KEY (username)
);
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('dave'), ('sarah'), ('bill');
With optimistic locking and tidb_constraint_check_in_place=OFF
:
BEGIN OPTIMISTIC;
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill');
Query OK, 3 rows affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 3 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('steve'),('elizabeth');
Query OK, 2 rows affected (0.00 sec)
Records: 2 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
COMMIT;
ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry 'bill' for key 'users.username'
In the preceding optimistic example, the unique check was deferred until the transaction is committed. This resulted in a duplicate key error, because the value bill
was already present.
You can disable this behavior by setting tidb_constraint_check_in_place
to ON
. When tidb_constraint_check_in_place=ON
, the unique constraint is checked when a statement is executed. Note that this variable is only applicable to optimistic transactions. For pessimistic transactions, you can control this behavior using the tidb_constraint_check_in_place_pessimistic
variable.
For example:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS users;
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
username VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL,
UNIQUE KEY (username)
);
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('dave'), ('sarah'), ('bill');
SET tidb_constraint_check_in_place = ON;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
BEGIN OPTIMISTIC;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill');
ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry 'bill' for key 'users.username'
The first INSERT
statement caused a duplicate key error. This causes additional network communication overhead and may reduce the throughput of insert operations.
In pessimistic transactions, by default, TiDB checks UNIQUE
constraints when a SQL statement that requires inserting or updating unique indexes is executed.
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS users;
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
username VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL,
UNIQUE KEY (username)
);
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('dave'), ('sarah'), ('bill');
BEGIN PESSIMISTIC;
INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill');
ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry 'bill' for key 'users.username'
To achieve better performance of pessimistic transactions, you can set the tidb_constraint_check_in_place_pessimistic
variable to OFF
, which allows TiDB to defer the unique constraint check of a unique index (to the next time when this index requires a lock or to the time when the transaction is committed) and skip the corresponding pessimistic lock. When using this variable, pay attention to the following:
-
Due to the deferred unique constraint check, TiDB might read results that do not meet the unique constraints and return a
Duplicate entry
error when you commit a pessimistic transaction. When this error occurs, TiDB rolls back the current transaction.The following example skips the lock to
bill
, so TiDB might get results that do not satisfy the uniqueness constraints.SET tidb_constraint_check_in_place_pessimistic = OFF; BEGIN PESSIMISTIC; INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill'); -- Query OK, 3 rows affected SELECT * FROM users FOR UPDATE;
As in the following example output, the query results of TiDB contain two
bills
, which does not satisfy the uniqueness constraints.+----+----------+ | id | username | +----+----------+ | 1 | dave | | 2 | sarah | | 3 | bill | | 7 | jane | | 8 | chris | | 9 | bill | +----+----------+
At this time, if the transaction is committed, TiDB will perform a unique constraint check, report a
Duplicate entry
error, and roll back the transaction.COMMIT;
ERROR 1062 (23000): Duplicate entry 'bill' for key 'users.username'
-
When this variable is disabled, committing a pessimistic transaction that needs to write data might return a
Write conflict
error. When this error occurs, TiDB rolls back the current transaction.As in the following example, if two concurrent transactions need to insert data to the same table, skipping the pessimistic lock causes TiDB to return a
Write conflict
error when you commit a transaction. And the transaction will be rolled back.DROP TABLE IF EXISTS users; CREATE TABLE users ( id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, username VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL, UNIQUE KEY (username) ); SET tidb_constraint_check_in_place_pessimistic = OFF; BEGIN PESSIMISTIC; INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill'); -- Query OK, 3 rows affected
At the same time, another session inserts
bill
to the same table.INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('bill'); -- Query OK, 1 row affected
Then, when you commit the transaction in the first session, TiDB reports a
Write conflict
error.COMMIT;
ERROR 9007 (HY000): Write conflict, txnStartTS=435688780611190794, conflictStartTS=435688783311536129, conflictCommitTS=435688783311536130, key={tableID=74, indexID=1, indexValues={bill, }} primary={tableID=74, indexID=1, indexValues={bill, }}, reason=LazyUniquenessCheck [try again later]
-
When this variable is disabled, if there is a write conflict among multiple pessimistic transactions, the pessimistic lock might be forced to roll back when other pessimistic transactions are committed, thus resulting in a
Pessimistic lock not found
error. When this error occurs, it means that deferring the unique constraint check of the pessimistic transaction is not suitable for your application scenario. In this case, consider adjusting the application logic to avoid the conflict or retrying the transaction after an error occurs. -
When this variable is disabled, executing a DML statement in a pessimistic transaction might return an error
8147: LazyUniquenessCheckFailure
.Note:
When the
8147
error occurs, TiDB rolls back the current transaction.As in the following example, at the execution of the
INSERT
statement, TiDB skips a lock. Then, at the execution of theDELETE
statement, TiDB locks the unique index and checks the unique constraints, so you will see an error is reported at theDELETE
statement.SET tidb_constraint_check_in_place_pessimistic = OFF; BEGIN PESSIMISTIC; INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane'), ('chris'), ('bill'); -- Query OK, 3 rows affected DELETE FROM users where username = 'bill';
ERROR 8147 (23000): transaction aborted because lazy uniqueness check is enabled and an error occurred: [kv:1062]Duplicate entry 'bill' for key 'users.username'
-
When this variable is disabled, the
1062 Duplicate entry
error might be not from the current SQL statement. Therefore, when a transaction operates on multiple tables that have indexes with the same name, you need to check the1062
error message to find which index the error is actually from.
Like MySQL, primary key constraints contain unique constraints, that is, creating a primary key constraint is equivalent to having a unique constraint. In addition, other primary key constraints of TiDB are also similar to those of MySQL.
For example:
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.12 sec)
CREATE TABLE t2 (a INT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
ERROR 1171 (42000): All parts of a PRIMARY KEY must be NOT NULL; if you need NULL in a key, use UNIQUE instead
CREATE TABLE t3 (a INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, b INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
ERROR 1068 (42000): Multiple primary key defined
CREATE TABLE t4 (a INT NOT NULL, b INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (a,b));
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.10 sec)
- Table
t2
failed to be created, because columna
is defined as the primary key and does not allow NULL values. - Table
t3
failed to be created, because a table can only have one primary key. - Table
t4
was created successfully, because even though there can be only one primary key, TiDB supports defining multiple columns as the composite primary key.
In addition to the rules above, TiDB currently only supports adding and deleting the primary keys of the NONCLUSTERED
type. For example:
CREATE TABLE t5 (a INT NOT NULL, b INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (a,b) CLUSTERED);
ALTER TABLE t5 DROP PRIMARY KEY;
ERROR 8200 (HY000): Unsupported drop primary key when the table is using clustered index
CREATE TABLE t5 (a INT NOT NULL, b INT NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (a,b) NONCLUSTERED);
ALTER TABLE t5 DROP PRIMARY KEY;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.10 sec)
For more details about the primary key of the CLUSTERED
type, refer to clustered index.
Note:
Starting from v6.6.0, TiDB supports the FOREIGN KEY constraints. Before v6.6.0, TiDB supports creating and deleting foreign key constraints, but the constraints are not actually effective. After upgrading TiDB to v6.6.0 or later, you can delete the invalid foreign key and create a new one to make the foreign key constraints effective. This feature becomes generally available in v8.5.0.
TiDB supports creating FOREIGN KEY
constraints in DDL commands.
For example:
CREATE TABLE users (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
doc JSON
);
CREATE TABLE orders (
id INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT,
user_id INT NOT NULL,
doc JSON,
FOREIGN KEY fk_user_id (user_id) REFERENCES users(id)
);
SELECT table_name, column_name, constraint_name, referenced_table_name, referenced_column_name
FROM information_schema.key_column_usage WHERE table_name IN ('users', 'orders');
+------------+-------------+-----------------+-----------------------+------------------------+
| table_name | column_name | constraint_name | referenced_table_name | referenced_column_name |
+------------+-------------+-----------------+-----------------------+------------------------+
| users | id | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL |
| orders | id | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL |
| orders | user_id | fk_user_id | users | id |
+------------+-------------+-----------------+-----------------------+------------------------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
TiDB also supports the syntax to DROP FOREIGN KEY
and ADD FOREIGN KEY
via the ALTER TABLE
command.
ALTER TABLE orders DROP FOREIGN KEY fk_user_id;
ALTER TABLE orders ADD FOREIGN KEY fk_user_id (user_id) REFERENCES users(id);