You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rewrite the summary of the page - explaining what Fellowship is following the text below:
"The Fellowship collective is an on-chain body designed to ensure the Polkadot network is able to incentivise, recognise ans retain expertise and knowledge over its protocol to guarantee continued maintenance and innovation.
As an on-chain self-sovereign social body aspiring to be both technocratic and meritocratic, it is crucial that Fellowship members are active in both reviewing the level of expertise of their peers and, importantly, reporting these evaluations. Without a system which enables a fluid and barrierless review-and-report cycle, valuable peers worthy of merit may languish at low-grades or be demoted. A difficult or tedious process may mean a lower candidate intake leading to attrition. Finally, and most importantly, if the UX is not sufficiently painless then oversight of the processes, and particularly promotion, becomes compromised which itself could lead to systemic security problems with the overall Polkadot governance system.
The document presents an overview on how best to enable Fellowship members and aspirational candidates to utilise and service this on-chain collective."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rewrite the summary of the page - explaining what Fellowship is following the text below:
"The Fellowship collective is an on-chain body designed to ensure the Polkadot network is able to incentivise, recognise ans retain expertise and knowledge over its protocol to guarantee continued maintenance and innovation.
As an on-chain self-sovereign social body aspiring to be both technocratic and meritocratic, it is crucial that Fellowship members are active in both reviewing the level of expertise of their peers and, importantly, reporting these evaluations. Without a system which enables a fluid and barrierless review-and-report cycle, valuable peers worthy of merit may languish at low-grades or be demoted. A difficult or tedious process may mean a lower candidate intake leading to attrition. Finally, and most importantly, if the UX is not sufficiently painless then oversight of the processes, and particularly promotion, becomes compromised which itself could lead to systemic security problems with the overall Polkadot governance system.
The document presents an overview on how best to enable Fellowship members and aspirational candidates to utilise and service this on-chain collective."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: