Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support SkipCheckIfFeeless extension for substrate node #5751

Closed
1 of 10 tasks
gupnik opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5756
Closed
1 of 10 tasks

Support SkipCheckIfFeeless extension for substrate node #5751

gupnik opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5756

Comments

@gupnik
Copy link
Contributor

gupnik commented Nov 13, 2023

  • I'm submitting a ...
  • Bug report
  • Feature request
  • Support request
  • Other
  • What is the current behavior and expected behavior?

paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1926 added SkipCheckIfFeeless extension. It needs to be added to Polkadot JS API.

  • What is the motivation for changing the behavior?

To support feeless payments for certain cases. Please refer to SkipCheckIfFeeless for more details.

  • Please tell us about your environment:

    • Version:

    • Environment:

      • Node.js
      • Browser
      • Other (limited support for other environments)
    • Language:

      • JavaScript
      • TypeScript (include tsc --version)
      • Other
@bkchr
Copy link

bkchr commented Nov 18, 2023

@jacogr could you please add this? It doesn't require any data being added to the tx or signed data.

@gupnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

gupnik commented Nov 18, 2023

Thanks @bkchr @jacogr!

@polkadot-js-bot
Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue if you think you have a related problem or query.

@polkadot-js polkadot-js locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants