-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: add support for fetch endpoints to topics module #9981
Comments
The Topics are generated as per the user's browsing history so I am assuming that the generated Topics for a user will not change drastically within a day. |
They change weekly, but I think it is hard to predict when the week would end for a given user.
this seems wise, assuming it is configurable and subject to publisher device access consent, like sharedid module. However, calling the api affects the training so one would likely want to do the fetch again on a different page on the same site assuming the topics module may at some point incorporate that info. If that date comes, we'll likely need to change caching assumptions |
Hello, As you may already know, Chrome 115 is now available and comes with the Topics API. I haven't closely followed the implementation of the iframe in Prebid and the limitations that led to the current proposal. However, I see some drawbacks with the solution proposed by Google. As suggested in this ticket, it would be great to have an additional option on the adapter to use Fetch instead of XHR to send user topics during the bid request (this option could be implemented here). Furthermore, granting the adtech actor full control of topics and allowing them to update the classifier by returning the HTTP header |
@github-kevin-margueritte this comment is a dupe of another issue, #9980, recode ajax to fetch and allow topics to be appended. This issue, 9981, is specific to the topics module, which intends to share topics from a limited set of topics networks with all bidders |
Follow-up on #10124 (comment) conversation since I understand it is closer to a feature request than an expected PR comment. |
@remysaissy yea since this module would require a custom config setup for each participating bidder/ssp that wants to utilize it, I think the default at this point in time should be 0. |
@jlquaccia , does #10124 close this? |
Type of issue
Feature Request
Description
Topics from the fetch headers may be more richly populated than topics gathered in the iframe. This feature request is to add support for an endpoint that reflects the topics it saw on a fetch api call headers instead of an injected frame doing a post message. Docs
Demo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: