Extensions inside the scope of the extension's field type fails

[chabb]

protobuf.js version: 6.6.1

I apologized for my weak english.

Google doc says that this is a common pattern :

message Baz {
  extend Foo {
    optional Baz foo_ext = 127;
  }
  ...
}

I have a proto build following this pattern that seems to fool pbjs when using -t static. With -t json, it works fine...

message CompletionRequest {

  extend common.RpcBlog { optional CompletionRequest rpc_id = 1145; }

 // there are some more fields
 // ... 
}

Here is the stack

Error: unresolvable field type: CompletionRequest
    at Error (native)
    at Field.resolve (/Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/src/field.js:229:19)
    at /Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:290:15
    at Array.forEach (native)
    at buildType (/Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:289:22)
    at buildNamespace (/Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:106:9)
    at /Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:123:13
    at Array.forEach (native)
    at buildNamespace (/Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:119:20)
    at /Users/francois.chabbey/thoughtspot/blink/node_modules/protobufjs/cli/targets/static.js:123:13

[dcodeIO]

Hard to tell, the error refers to ValidateContextRequest. Do you have additional context - or could you maybe provide a minimal failing .proto file for reference? That would be perfect.

[chabb]

Thanks for your response.. i'll come back tomorrow with a small example.. I corrected the above stacktrace

[chabb]

So this works

node ./node_modules/protobufjs/bin/pbjs -t static ./test.proto

message Foo {
  extensions 100 to 199;
}

message Baz {
  extend Foo {  optional Baz bar = 126; }

  optional int32 request_call_id = 2;
}

Now the issue is that i have biggest proto, that i have not written myself.. and in that case it fails, the issue comes frome the extend .. part. If i remove this part, the pbjs runs successfully.

I will try to come with a reproductible example that fails

[dcodeIO]

Might be related: #595

[dcodeIO]

Closing this issue for now as it hasn't received any replies recently. Feel free to reopen it if necessary!