author	tags
emchateau	nlp

Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)

https://www.sesync.org/resources/critical-discourse-analysis-what-it

L’analyse critique du discours (Critical Discourse Analysis ou CDA) désigne une série d’approches que les chercheurs utilisent pour analyser critique les textes et les artefacts culturels pour révéler les connotation et rendre compte du narratif supporté par ces connotations.

considérer le contexte dans lequel les textes sont produits, distribués et consommés
désigner la manière dont les gens utilisent les textes pour construire le sens de soi, de la société et de la réalité matérielle
explorer la manière dont les aspects textuels influencent des discours sociaux plus large, des instances politiques, les valeurs institutionnelles et supportent ou mettent en cause les hégémonies (Burke 187)

Arrière-plan théorique la dénotation, connotation et le mythe de Barthes.

une série d’approche sur la manière dont les chercheurs

Sample Research Questions for CDA Analysis, with Illustrative Research Papers:

(Links to these papers are provided below.)

How do denotation and connotation reveal submerged power structures and hegemonies? (Benjaminsen 2020; Stibbe 2015)
How have various stakeholders spoken, written, and visualized their perspectives on particular S-E issues? (Burke et al. 2015)
How does the lack of discourse on a subject indicate erasures or subordinations of stakeholder perspectives or an incomplete understanding of the complexity of a S-E system? (Hoover et al. 2021)
How can we translate texts into groupings, themes, and S-E network visuals that reveal relationships among system components? Can CDA reveal patterns of discourse that exhibit a range of perspectives in S-E systems? (Urbanitti et al. 2020)
How can scientists working with stakeholders use language to empower their perspectives on the proper course of governance or management of S-E systems? (Lund et al. 2022)
In what ways can quantitative analysis be a starting point for qualitative synthesis methods that support the integration of disciplinary silos, geographies, stakeholders, and governance regimes? (Keith et al. 2022)
How can computer-based textual and visual analysis help us process and find significant trends in big data and social media activity? (Vigl et al. 2021)

References

Blanc, G. The Invention of Green Colonialism. (H. Morrison, Trans.). Polity Press. (2022).

Burke, B.J., Welch-Divine, M., & Gustafson, S. (2015). Nature Talk in an Appalachian Newspaper: What Environmental Discourse Analysis Reveals about Efforts to Address Exurbanization and Climate Change. Human Organization, 74(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259-74.2.185

Benjaminsen, T.A. (2021). Depicting decline: images and myths in environmental discourse analysis. Landscape Research, 46(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2020.1737663

Gadsden, G.I., Golden, N., & Harris, N.C. (2023). Place-Based Bias in Environmental Scholarship Derived from Social–Ecological Landscapes of Fear. BioScience, 73(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac095

Hoover, F., Meerow, S., Grabowski, Z.J., & McPhearson, T. (2021). Environmental justice implications of siting criteria in urban green infrastructure planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(5), 665-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1945916

Keith, R.J., Given, L.M., Martin, J.M., & Hochuli, D.F. (2022), Collaborating with qualitative researchers to co-design social-ecological studies. Austral Ecology, 47(4), 880-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13172

Lund, A.J., Harrington, E., Albrecht, T.R. et al. (2022). Tracing the inclusion of health as a component of the food-energy-water nexus in dam management in the Senegal River Basin. *Environmental Science and Policy,*133, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.03.005

O'Neill, S.J., & Smith, N. (2014), Climate change and visual imagery. WIREs Climate Change, 5(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.249

Stibbe, A. (2020). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By (2nd edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855512

Urbinatti, A.M., Benites-Lazaro, L.L., de Carvalho, C.M., & Giatti, L.L. (2020). The conceptual basis of water-energy-food nexus governance: systematic literature review using network and discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 17(2), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2020.1749086

Vigl, L.E., Marsoner, T., Giombini, V. et al. (2021). Harnessing artificial intelligence technology and social media data to support Cultural Ecosystem Service assessments. People and Nature, 3(3), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10199

Authors

Heidi Scott, SESYNC

Date

April 07, 2023

Share