-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Making note of new ideas and other tasks #334
Comments
Great! |
Some layers such as those in justice map overlap each other making it irrelevant for the layer below it to be added to the map. This is the same for some layers in the weather group. It is hard to differentiate between layers in the indigenous lands group as well. How about we make it so that only one of those layers are active at a time in each of those groups like the base layers?
We do not show the base layer section in the layer browser menu. It will show when there are more than one base layers. Do we have plans to add more than one base layer to this control? Shall we add styling to it regardless?
The fractracker layers haven't been grouped because the extents for different for each layer at the time of adding it to the layer browser control. After the recent update to the fractracker_mobile layer, these could be grouped together.
I need to look into this more but right now this layer adds all the markers when it is added to the map. We could either change it to pull in markers according to the polygon as done in firetracker_mobile layer or remove the feature of requesting data on every
|
|
Ah, so when this is integrated into other sites like publiclab.org users can click the |
Yes, that's what i was thinking, but it seems hard! |
Is there a reason to have it as part of the URL hash? Shall we have it as a query string as this will not be dynamic and leave the hash for dynamic map parameters? I think setting the layer control's collapsed option in the one-liner code after identifying it from the query string would be simpler. @jywarren and @sagarpreet-chadha, what do think? |
|
I like that idea, it would look great! |
That sounds great! Sorry for late response! 😓 |
No problem. 😄 |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: