We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
literals.py
It would be nice if we consequently used string literals for type checks as in here.
To do so, we would set up a dedicated file, literals.py, and move all "stringly-typed" function arguments to the file.
We could start with the arguments to the feols and fepois APIs, for which we have the following stringly-typed arguments:
fepois
cc @leostimpfle
Maybe of interest to @marcandre259 or @rafimikail ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've starting working on #557 with the weights for did, it's an issue that's also interesting for my work, so motivating to look at.
If @rafimikail or another contributor is actively working on #557 however, or once I get something done there, I would be happy to pick up this issue.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ah, very cool! I don't think Rafi is currently working on #557 so I don't think there are any double efforts at the moment =)
No branches or pull requests
It would be nice if we consequently used string literals for type checks as in here.
To do so, we would set up a dedicated file,
literals.py
, and move all "stringly-typed" function arguments to the file.We could start with the arguments to the feols and
fepois
APIs, for which we have the following stringly-typed arguments:cc @leostimpfle
Maybe of interest to @marcandre259 or @rafimikail ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: