-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update the Hangman game #1085
Comments
I think having control over the config directly is quite useful. So maybe instead we could have an additional optional param for difficulty. This param would set the "default" config for the game, but users could still give the existing params to overwrite that if needed. IE you could do What do you think of that? |
Maybe...we can have both? The 3 modes added on to the current implementation of being able to have full control over the generated word? |
That's sort of what I was suggesting, with an additional optional param for difficulty. However, rather than only allowing one or the other, I proposed that we would allow both if the user wanted, having the specific config overwrite the defaults for the difficulty. |
Would the amount of times that one of the 4 current optional arguments be a factor that affects the decision? As in, if most of the time, users just use the command without arguments |
I want to do this issue, can I? |
Description
In the hangman command, I think it would be nice if modes of "easy", "medium" and "hard" were added, instead of the 4 optional arguments it currently has.
Reasoning
It could make the game more flexible and easier to change it up
Proposed Implementation
By doing
def hangman(self, ctx, *args)
Would you like to implement this yourself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: