bpo-42990: Further refactoring of PyEval_ functions. #24368
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rame, and eval-frame parts.
…ore like other vector calls.
|
(Isn't news also used to alert developers of structural changes to the interpreter?) |
|
There's no API changes, so I assumed not. |
adorilson
pushed a commit
to adorilson/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
* Further refactoring of PyEval_EvalCode and friends. Break into make-frame, and eval-frame parts. * Simplify function vector call using new _PyEval_Vector. * Remove unused internal functions: _PyEval_EvalCodeWithName and _PyEval_EvalCode. * Don't use legacy function PyEval_EvalCodeEx.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes a further layer of indirection for calling Python functions, by replacing
_PyEval_EvalCodeWithName()which took a large an incoherent set of parameters with_PyEval_Vector()which takes fewer than half the parameters, and is more efficient in the common case of calling a function.Skipping NEWS as this should have no visible effect on API or performance, nor does it fix any bugs. It just makes our life easier in the future.
https://bugs.python.org/issue42990