-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-45141: allow specifying files for mailcap.getcaps #28245
Conversation
Hello, and thanks for your contribution! I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept this contribution by verifying everyone involved has signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA). CLA MissingOur records indicate the following people have not signed the CLA: For legal reasons we need all the people listed to sign the CLA before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue. If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received. Thanks again for the contribution, we look forward to reviewing it! |
This allows the caller of the function to specify a list of files to parse and get the MIME mapping from. The added parameter is optional and the previous behaviour is preserved otherwise.
44d1cf5
to
25a12c6
Compare
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ran 8 tests in 0.023s
OK
== Tests result: SUCCESS ==
Note that mailcap will be deprecated in Python 3.11 and removed in 3.13: |
Now that the module has been deprecated and the related issue has been closed. I think we can close the PR. |
I agree. Closing because 3.12 (the last version with |
This allows the caller of the function to specify a list of files to
parse and get the MIME mapping from. The added parameter is optional and
the previous behaviour is preserved otherwise.
https://bugs.python.org/issue45141