Notes on maintaining the Neovim project.
- Decide by cost-benefit
- Write down what was decided
- Constraints are good
- Use automation to solve problems
- Never break the API... but sometimes break the UI
In practice we haven't found a way to forecast more precisely than "next" and "after next". So there are usually one or two (at most) planned milestones:
- Next bugfix-release (1.0.x)
- Next feature-release (1.x.0)
The forecasting problem might be solved with an explicit priority system (like Vim's todo.txt). Meanwhile the Neovim priority system is defined by:
- PRs nearing completion.
- Issue labels. E.g. the
has:plan
label increases the ticket's priority merely for having a plan written down: it is closer to completion than tickets without a plan. - Comment activity or new information.
Anything that isn't in the next milestone, and doesn't have a finished PR—is just not something you care very much about, by construction. Post-release you can review open issues, but chances are your next milestone is already getting full... :)
Release "often", but not "early".
The (unreleased) master
branch is the "early" channel; it should not be
released if it's not stable. High-risk changes may be merged to master
if
the next release is not imminent.
For maintenance releases, create a release-x.y
branch. If the current release
has a major bug:
- Fix the bug on
master
. - Cherry-pick the fix to
release-x.y
. - Cut a release from
release-x.y
.- Run
./scripts/release.sh
(requires git cliff) - The CI job will update the release assets and force-push to the "stable" tag.
- Run
Neovim automation includes a backport bot.
Trigger the action by labeling a PR with ci:backport release-x.y
. See .github/workflows/backport.yml
.
Neovim inherits many features and design decisions from Vim, not all of which align with the goals of this project. It is sometimes desired or necessary to remove existing features, or refactor parts of the code that would change user's workflow. In these cases, a deprecation policy is needed to properly inform users of the change.
When a (non-experimental) feature is slated to be removed it should:
- Be soft deprecated in the next release
- Use of the deprecated feature will still work.
- This means deprecating via documentation and annotation (
@deprecated
). - Include a note in
deprecated.txt
. - For Lua features, use
vim.deprecate()
. The specified version is the current minor version + 2. For example, if the current version isv0.10.0-dev-1957+gd676746c33
then use0.12
. - For Vimscript features, use
v:lua.vim.deprecate()
. Use the same version as described for Lua features. vim.deprecate(…, 'x.y.z')
where major versionx
is greater than the current Nvim major version, is always treated as soft deprecation.
- Be hard deprecated in a following a release in which it was soft deprecated.
- Use of the deprecated feature will still work but should issue a warning.
- Features implemented in C will need bespoke implementations to communicate to users that the feature is deprecated.
- Be removed in a release following the release in which it was hard deprecated
- Usually this will be the next release, but it may be a later release if a longer deprecation cycle is desired
- If possible, keep the feature as a stub (e.g. function API) and issue an error when it is accessed.
Example:
Deprecation Removal
┆ ┆ ┆
┆ Soft ┆ Hard ┆
┆ Deprecation ┆ Deprecation ┆
┆ Period ┆ Period ┆
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Version: 0.10 0.11 0.12
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Old code Old code Old code
+ +
New code New code New code
Feature removals which may benefit from community input or further discussion should also have a tracking issue (which should be linked to in the release notes).
Exceptions to this policy may be made (for experimental subsystems or when there is broad consensus among maintainers). The rationale for the exception should be stated explicitly and publicly.
For some dependencies we maintain temporary "forks", which are simply private
branches with a few extra patches, while we wait for the upstream project to
merge the patches. This is done instead of maintaining the patches as (fragile)
CMake PATCH_COMMAND
steps.
These "bundled" dependencies can be updated by bumping their versions in cmake.deps/deps.txt
.
Some can be auto-bumped by scripts/bump_deps.lua
.
- LuaJIT
- Lua
- Luv
- When bumping, also sync our bundled documentation with the upstream documentation.
- gettext
- libiconv
- libuv
- lua-compat
- tree-sitter
- unibilium
- The original project was abandoned, so the neovim/unibilium fork is considered "upstream" and is maintained on the
master
branch.
- The original project was abandoned, so the neovim/unibilium fork is considered "upstream" and is maintained on the
- treesitter parsers
These dependencies are "vendored" (inlined), we must update the sources manually:
src/mpack/
: libmpack- send improvements upstream!
src/xdiff/
: xdiffsrc/cjson/
: lua-cjsonsrc/klib/
: Klibsrc/vterm/
: libvterm, mirrorruntime/lua/vim/inspect.lua
: inspect.luasrc/nvim/tui/terminfo_defs.h
: terminfo definitions- Run
scripts/update_terminfo.sh
to update these definitions.
- Run
runtime/lua/vim/lsp/_meta/protocol.lua
: LSP specification- Run
scripts/gen_lsp.lua
to update.
- Run
runtime/lua/vim/_meta/lpeg.lua
: LPeg definitions.- Refer to
LuaCATS/lpeg
for updates. - Update the git SHA revision from which the documentation was taken.
- Refer to
runtime/lua/vim/re.lua
: LPeg regex module.- Vendored from LPeg. Needs to be updated when LPeg is updated.
runtime/lua/vim/_meta/re.lua
: docs for LPeg regex module.- Needs to be updated when LPeg is updated.
src/bit.c
: only for PUC lua: port ofrequire'bit'
from luajit https://bitop.luajit.org/runtime/lua/coxpcall.lua
: coxpcall (only needed for PUC lua, builtin to luajit)
- GitHub users:
- Org secrets/tokens:
CODECOV_TOKEN
BACKPORT_KEY
- Org/repo variables:
BACKPORT_APP
- Domain names (held in https://namecheap.com):
- neovim.org
- neovim.io
- packspec.org
- pkgjson.org
- DNS for the above domains is managed in https://cloudflare.com (not the domain registrar)
Refactoring Vim structurally and aesthetically is an important goal of Neovim. But there are some modules that should not be changed significantly, because they are maintained by Vim, at present. Until someone takes "ownership" of these modules, the cost of any significant changes (including style or structural changes that re-arrange the code) to these modules outweighs the benefit. The modules are:
regexp.c
indent_c.c
Discussions from issues and PRs are backed up here: https://github.com/neovim/neovim-backup
- CI and automation jobs are primarily driven by GitHub Actions.
- Avoid macOS if an Ubuntu or a Windows runner can be used instead. This is because macOS runners have tighter restrictions on the number of concurrent jobs.
- Runner versions:
- For special-purpose jobs where the runner version doesn't really matter,
prefer
-latest
tags so we don't need to manually bump the versions. An example of a special-purpose workflow islabeler_pr.yml
. - For our testing job
test.yml
, prefer to use the latest version explicitly. Avoid using the-latest
tags here as it makes it difficult to determine from an unrelated PR if a failure is due to the PR itself or due to GitHub bumping the-latest
tag without our knowledge. There's also a high risk that automatically bumping the CI versions will fail due to manual work being required from experience. - For our release job, which is
release.yml
, prefer to use the oldest stable (i.e. non-deprecated) versions available. The reason is that we're trying to produce images that work in the broadest number of environments, and therefore want to use older releases.
- For special-purpose jobs where the runner version doesn't really matter,
prefer
Some github labels are used to trigger certain jobs:
ci:backport release-x.y
- backport to branchrelease-x.y
ci:s390x
- enable s390x CIci:skip-news
- skip news.yml workflowsci:windows-asan
- test windows with ASAN enabledneeds:response
- close PR after a certain amount of time if author doesn't respond