forked from snyk-labs/nodejs-goof
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CVE-2021-23807 - medium detected in jsonpointer['4.0.1'] #331
Comments
This was referenced Sep 24, 2022
This was referenced Sep 26, 2022
This was referenced Sep 29, 2022
This was referenced Oct 3, 2022
This was referenced Oct 5, 2022
This was referenced Jan 27, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
0 participants
Package Name: jsonpointer
Package Version: ['4.0.1']
Package Manager: npm
Target File: package.json
Severity Level: medium
Snyk ID: SNYK-JS-JSONPOINTER-1577288
Snyk CVE: CVE-2021-23807
Snyk CWE: CWE-1321
Link to issue in Snyk: https://app.snyk.io/org/cse_rhicksiii91/project/14f822de-b806-4bd7-9ad2-767a7feebe1d
Snyk Description: ## Overview
jsonpointer is a Simple JSON Addressing.
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. A type confusion vulnerability can lead to a bypass of a previous Prototype Pollution fix when the pointer components are arrays.
PoC
Details
Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. Prototype Pollution refers to the ability to inject properties into existing JavaScript language construct prototypes, such as objects. JavaScript allows all Object attributes to be altered, including their magical attributes such as
_proto_
,constructor
andprototype
. An attacker manipulates these attributes to overwrite, or pollute, a JavaScript application object prototype of the base object by injecting other values. Properties on theObject.prototype
are then inherited by all the JavaScript objects through the prototype chain. When that happens, this leads to either denial of service by triggering JavaScript exceptions, or it tampers with the application source code to force the code path that the attacker injects, thereby leading to remote code execution.There are two main ways in which the pollution of prototypes occurs:
Unsafe
Object
recursive mergeProperty definition by path
Unsafe Object recursive merge
The logic of a vulnerable recursive merge function follows the following high-level model:
When the source object contains a property named
_proto_
defined withObject.defineProperty()
, the condition that checks if the property exists and is an object on both the target and the source passes and the merge recurses with the target, being the prototype ofObject
and the source ofObject
as defined by the attacker. Properties are then copied on theObject
prototype.Clone operations are a special sub-class of unsafe recursive merges, which occur when a recursive merge is conducted on an empty object:
merge({},source)
.lodash
andHoek
are examples of libraries susceptible to recursive merge attacks.Property definition by path
There are a few JavaScript libraries that use an API to define property values on an object based on a given path. The function that is generally affected contains this signature:
theFunction(object, path, value)
If the attacker can control the value of “path”, they can set this value to
_proto_.myValue
.myValue
is then assigned to the prototype of the class of the object.Types of attacks
There are a few methods by which Prototype Pollution can be manipulated:
DoS occurs when
Object
holds generic functions that are implicitly called for various operations (for example,toString
andvalueOf
).The attacker pollutes
Object.prototype.someattr
and alters its state to an unexpected value such asInt
orObject
. In this case, the code fails and is likely to cause a denial of service.For example: if an attacker pollutes
Object.prototype.toString
by defining it as an integer, if the codebase at any point was reliant onsomeobject.toString()
it would fail.For example:
eval(someobject.someattr)
. In this case, if the attacker pollutesObject.prototype.someattr
they are likely to be able to leverage this in order to execute code.For example: if a codebase checks privileges for
someuser.isAdmin
, then when the attacker pollutesObject.prototype.isAdmin
and sets it to equaltrue
, they can then achieve admin privileges.Affected environments
The following environments are susceptible to a Prototype Pollution attack:
Application server
Web server
How to prevent
Freeze the prototype— use
Object.freeze (Object.prototype)
.Require schema validation of JSON input.
Avoid using unsafe recursive merge functions.
Consider using objects without prototypes (for example,
Object.create(null)
), breaking the prototype chain and preventing pollution.As a best practice use
Map
instead ofObject
.For more information on this vulnerability type:
Arteau, Oliver. “JavaScript prototype pollution attack in NodeJS application.” GitHub, 26 May 2018
Remediation
Upgrade
jsonpointer
to version 5.0.0 or higher.References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: