Data Handling and Conversion

Please Note: This documentation is intended for Terraform AWS Provider code developers. Typical operators writing and applying Terraform configurations do not need to read or understand this material.

The Terraform AWS Provider codebase bridges the implementation of a Terraform Plugin and an AWS API client to support AWS operations and data types as Terraform Resources. Data handling and conversion is a large portion of resource implementation given the domain specific implementations of each side of the provider. The first where Terraform is a generic infrastructure as code tool with a generic data model and the other where the details are driven by AWS API data modeling concepts. This guide is intended to explain and show preferred Terraform AWS Provider code implementations required to successfully translate data between these two systems.

At the bottom of this documentation is a Glossary section, which may be a helpful reference while reading the other sections.

Data Conversions in Terraform Providers
- Implicit State Passthrough
Data Conversions in the Terraform AWS Provider
Recommended Implementations
Further Guidelines
Glossary

Data Conversions in Terraform Providers

Before getting into highly specific documentation about the Terraform AWS Provider handling of data, it may be helpful to briefly highlight how Terraform Plugins (Terraform Providers in this case) interact with Terraform CLI and the Terraform State in general and where this documentation fits into the whole process.

There are two primary data flows that are typically handled by resources within a Terraform Provider. Data is either being converted from a planned new Terraform State into making a remote system request or a remote system response is being converted into a applied new Terraform State. The semantics of how the data of the planned new Terraform State is surfaced to the resource implementation is determined by where a resource is in its lifecycle and mainly handled by Terraform CLI. This concept can be explored further in the Terraform Resource Instance Change Lifecycle documentation, with the caveat that some additional behaviors occur within the Terraform Plugin SDK as well (if the Terraform Plugin uses that implementation detail).

As a generic walkthrough, the following data handling occurs when creating a Terraform Resource:

An operator creates a Terraform configuration with a new resource defined and runs terraform apply
Terraform CLI merges an empty prior state for the resource, along with the given configuration state, to create a planned new state for the resource
Terraform CLI sends a Terraform Plugin Protocol request to create the new resource with its planned new state data
If the Terraform Plugin is using a higher level library, such as the Terraform Plugin SDK, that library receives the request and translates the Terraform Plugin Protocol data types into the expected library types
Terraform Plugin invokes the resource creation function with the planned new state data
- The planned new state data is converted into an remote system request (e.g. API creation request) that is invoked
- The remote system response is received and the data is converted into an applied new state
If the Terraform Plugin is using a higher level library, such as the Terraform Plugin SDK, that library translates the library types back into Terraform Plugin Protocol data types
Terraform Plugin responds to Terraform Plugin Protocol request with the new state data
Terraform CLI verifies and stores the new state

The highlighted lines are the focus of this documentation today. In the future however, the Terraform AWS Provider may replace certain functionality in the items mentioning the Terraform Plugin SDK above to workaround certain limitations of that particular library.

Implicit State Passthrough

An important behavior to note with Terraform State handling is if the value of a particular root attribute or block is not refreshed during plan or apply operations, then the prior Terraform State is implicitly deep copied to the new Terraform State for that attribute or block.

Given a resource with a writeable root attribute named not_set_attr that never calls d.Set("not_set_attr", /* ... nil or value */), the following happens:

If the Terraform configuration contains not_set_attr = "anything" on resource creation, the Terraform State contains not_set_attr equal to "anything" after apply.
If the Terraform configuration is updated to not_set_attr = "updated", the Terraform State contains not_set_attr equal to "updated" after apply.
If the attribute was meant to be associated with a remote system value, it will never update the Terraform State on plan or apply with the remote value. Effectively, it cannot perform drift detection with the remote value.

This however does not apply for nested attributes and blocks if the parent block is refreshed. Given a resource with a root block named parent, nested child attributes named set_attr and not_set_attr, and that calls d.Set("parent", /* ... only refreshes nested set_attr ... */), the Terraform State for the nested not_set_attr will not be copied.

There are valid use cases for passthrough attribute values such as these (see the Virtual Attributes section), however the behavior can be confusing or incorrect for operators if the drift detection is expected. Typically these types of drift detection issues can be discovered by implementing resource import testing with state verification.

Data Conversions in the Terraform AWS Provider

To expand on the data handling that occurs specifically within the Terraform AWS Provider resource implementations, the above resource creation items become the below in practice given our current usage of the Terraform Plugin SDK:

The Create/CreateContext function of a schema.Resource is invoked with *schema.ResourceData containing the planned new state data (conventionally named d) and an AWS API client (conventionally named meta).
- Note: Before reaching this point, the ResourceData was already translated from the Terraform Plugin Protocol data types by the Terraform Plugin SDK so values can be read by invoking d.Get() and d.GetOk() receiver methods with Attribute and Block names from the Schema of the schema.Resource.
An AWS Go SDK operation input type (e.g. *ec2.CreateVpcInput) is initialized
For each necessary field to configure in the operation input type, the data is read from the ResourceData (e.g. d.Get(), d.GetOk()) and converted into the AWS Go SDK type for the field (e.g. *string)
The AWS Go SDK operation is invoked and the output type (e.g. *ec2.CreateVpcOutput) is initialized
For each necessary Attribute, Block, or resource identifier to be saved in the state, the data is read from the AWS Go SDK type for the field (*string), if necessary converted into a ResourceData compatible type, and saved into a mutated ResourceData (e.g. d.Set(), d.SetId())
Function is returned

Type Mapping

To further understand the necessary data conversions used throughout the Terraform AWS Provider codebase between AWS Go SDK types and the Terraform Plugin SDK, the following table can be referenced for most scenarios:

AWS API Model	AWS Go SDK	Terraform Plugin SDK	Terraform Language/State
`boolean`	`*bool`	`TypeBool` (`bool`)	`bool`
`float`	`*float64`	`TypeFloat` (`float64`)	`number`
`integer`	`*int64`	`TypeInt` (`int`)	`number`
`list`	`[]*T`	`TypeList` (`[]interface{}` of `T`) `TypeSet` (`*schema.Set` of `T`)	`list(any)` `set(any)`
`map`	`map[T1]*T2`	`TypeMap` (`map[string]interface{}`)	`map(any)`
`string`	`*string`	`TypeString` (`string`)	`string`
`structure`	`struct`	`TypeList` (`[]interface{}` of `map[string]interface{}`)	`list(object(any))`
`timestamp`	`*time.Time`	`TypeString` (typically RFC3339 formatted)	`string`

You may notice there are type encoding differences the AWS Go SDK and Terraform Plugin SDK:

AWS Go SDK types are all Go pointer types, while Terraform Plugin SDK types are not.
AWS Go SDK structures are the Go struct type, while there is no semantically equivalent Terraform Plugin SDK type. Instead they are represented as a slice of interfaces with an underlying map of interfaces.
AWS Go SDK types are all Go concrete types, while the Terraform Plugin SDK types for collections and maps are interfaces.
AWS Go SDK whole numeric type is always 64-bit, while the Terraform Plugin SDK type is implementation-specific.

Conceptually, the first and second items above the most problematic in the Terraform AWS Provider codebase. The first item because non-pointer types in Go cannot implement the concept of no value (nil). The Zero Value Mapping section will go into more details about the implications of this limitation. The second item because it can be confusing to always handle a structure ("object") type as a list.

There are efforts to replace the Terraform Plugin type system with one similar the underlying Terraform CLI type system. As these efforts materialize, this documentation will be updated.

Zero Value Mapping

As mentioned in the Type Mapping section, there is a discrepency with how the Terraform Plugin SDK represents values and the reality that a Terraform State may not configure an Attribute. These values will default to the matching underlying Go type "zero value" if not set:

Terraform Plugin SDK	Go Type	Zero Value
`TypeBool`	`bool`	`false`
`TypeFloat`	`float64`	`0.0`
`TypeInt`	`int`	`0`
`TypeString`	`string`	`""`

For Terraform resource logic this means that these special values must always be accounted for in implementation. The semantics of the API and its meaning of the zero value will determine whether:

If it is not used/needed, then generally the zero value can safely be used to store an "unset" value and should be ignored when sending to the API.
If it is used/needed, whether:
- A value can always be set and it is safe to always send to the API. Generally, boolean values fall into this category.
- A different default/sentinel value must be used as the "unset" value so it can either match the default of the API or be ignored when sending to the API.
- A special type implementation is required within the schema to workaround the limitation.

The maintainers can provide guidance on appropriate solutions for cases not mentioned in the Recommended Implementation section.

Root Attributes Versus Block Attributes

All Attributes and Blocks at the top level of schema.Resource Schema are considered "root" attributes. These will always be handled with receiver methods on ResourceData, such as reading with d.Get(), d.GetOk(), etc. and writing with d.Set(). Any nested Attributes and Blocks inside those root Blocks will then be handled with standard Go types according to the table in the Type Mapping section.

By convention in the codebase, each level of Block handling beyond root attributes should be separated into "expand" functions that convert Terraform Plugin SDK data into the equivalent AWS Go SDK type (typically named expand{Service}{Type}) and "flatten" functions that convert an AWS Go SDK type into the equivalent Terraform Plugin SDK data (typically named flatten{Service}{Type}). The Recommended Implementations section will go into those details.

NOTE: While it is possible in certain type scenarios to deeply read and write ResourceData information for a Block Attribute, this practice is discouraged in preference of only handling root Attributes and Blocks.

Recommended Implementations

Given the various complexities around the Terraform Plugin SDK type system, this section contains recommended implementations for Terraform AWS Provider resource code based on the Type Mapping section and the features of the Terraform Plugin SDK and AWS Go SDK. The eventual goal and styling for many of these recommendations is to ease static analysis of the codebase and future potential code generation efforts.

Some of these coding patterns may not be well represented in the codebase, as refactoring the many older styles over years of community development is a large task, however this is meant to represent the most preferable implementations today. These will continue to evolve as this codebase and the Terraform Plugin ecosystem changes.

Expand Functions for Blocks

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    if tfMap == nil {
        return nil
    }

    apiObject := &service.Structure{}

    // ... nested attribute handling ...

    return apiObject
}

func expandServiceStructures(tfList []interface{}) []*service.Structure {
    if len(tfList) == 0 {
        return nil
    }

    var apiObjects []*service.Structure

    for _, tfMapRaw := range tfList {
        tfMap, ok := tfMapRaw.(map[string]interface{})

        if !ok {
            continue
        }

        apiObject := expandServiceStructure(tfMap)

        if apiObject == nil {
            continue
        }

        apiObjects = append(apiObjects, apiObject)
    }

    return apiObjects
}

Flatten Functions for Blocks

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    if apiObject == nil {
        return nil
    }

    tfMap := map[string]interface{}{}

    // ... nested attribute handling ...

    return tfMap
}

func flattenServiceStructures(apiObjects []*service.Structure) []interface{} {
    if len(apiObjects) == 0 {
        return nil
    }

    var tfList []interface{}

    for _, apiObject := range apiObjects {
        if apiObject == nil {
            continue
        }

        tfList = append(tfList, flattenServiceStructure(apiObject))
    }

    return tfList
}

Root TypeBool and AWS Boolean

To read, if always sending the attribute value is correct:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{
    AttributeName: aws.String(d.Get("attribute_name").(bool))
}

Otherwise to read, if only sending the attribute value when true is preferred (!ok for opposite):

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok {
    input.AttributeName = aws.Bool(v.(bool))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", output.Thing.AttributeName)

Root TypeFloat and AWS Float

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok {
    input.AttributeName = aws.Float64(v.(float64))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", output.Thing.AttributeName)

Root TypeInt and AWS Integer

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok {
    input.AttributeName = aws.Int64(int64(v.(int)))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", output.Thing.AttributeName)

Root TypeList of Resource and AWS List of Structure

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && len(v.([]interface{})) > 0 {
    input.AttributeName = expandServiceStructures(v.([]interface{}))
}

To write:

if err := d.Set("attribute_name", flattenServiceStructures(output.Thing.AttributeName)); err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("error setting attribute_name: %w", err)
}

Root TypeList of Resource and AWS Structure

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && len(v.([]interface{})) > 0 && v.([]interface{})[0] != nil {
    input.AttributeName = expandServiceStructure(v.([]interface{})[0].(map[string]interface{}))
}

To write (likely to have helper function introduced soon):

if output.Thing.AttributeName != nil {
    if err := d.Set("attribute_name", []interface{}{flattenServiceStructure(output.Thing.AttributeName)}); err != nil {
        return fmt.Errorf("error setting attribute_name: %w", err)
    }
} else {
    d.Set("attribute_name", nil)
}

Root TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && len(v.([]interface{})) > 0 {
    input.AttributeName = expandStringList(v.([]interface{}))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", aws.StringValueSlice(output.Thing.AttributeName))

Root TypeMap of TypeString and AWS Map of String

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && len(v.(map[string]interface{})) > 0 {
    input.AttributeName = expandStringMap(v.(map[string]interface{}))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", aws.StringValueMap(output.Thing.AttributeName))

Root TypeSet of Resource and AWS List of Structure

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && v.(*schema.Set).Len() > 0 {
    input.AttributeName = expandServiceStructures(v.(*schema.Set).List())
}

To write:

if err := d.Set("attribute_name", flattenServiceStructures(output.Thing.AttributeNames)); err != nil {
    return fmt.Errorf("error setting attribute_name: %w", err)
}

Root TypeSet of TypeString and AWS List of String

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok && v.(*schema.Set).Len() > 0 {
    input.AttributeName = expandStringSet(v.(*schema.Set))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", aws.StringValueSlice(output.Thing.AttributeName))

Root TypeString and AWS String

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok {
    input.AttributeName = aws.String(v.(string))
}

To write:

d.Set("attribute_name", output.Thing.AttributeName)

Root TypeString and AWS Timestamp

To ensure that parsing the read string value does not fail, define attribute_name's schema.Schema with an appropriate ValidateFunc:

"attribute_name": {
    Type:         schema.TypeString,
    // ...
    ValidateFunc: validation.IsRFC3339Time,
},

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := d.GetOk("attribute_name"); ok {
    t, _ := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, v.(string))

    input.AttributeName = aws.Time(t)
}

To write:

if output.Thing.AttributeName != nil {
    d.Set("attribute_name", aws.TimeValue(output.Thing.AttributeName).Format(time.RFC3339))
} else {
    d.Set("attribute_name", nil)
}

Nested TypeBool and AWS Boolean

To read, if always sending the attribute value is correct:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(bool); ok {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.Bool(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To read, if only sending the attribute value when true is preferred (!v for opposite):

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(bool); ok && v {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.Bool(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.BoolValue(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeFloat and AWS Float

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(int); ok && v != 0.0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.Float64(float64(v))
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.Float64Value(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeInt and AWS Integer

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(int); ok && v != 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.Int64(int64(v))
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.Int64Value(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeList of Resource and AWS List of Structure

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].([]interface{}); ok && len(v) > 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandServiceStructures(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = flattenServiceNestedStructures(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeList of Resource and AWS Structure

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].([]interface{}); ok && len(v) > 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandServiceStructure(v[0].map[string]interface{})
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = []interface{}{flattenServiceNestedStructure(v)}
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].([]interface{}); ok && len(v) > 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandStringList(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.StringValueSlice(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeMap of TypeString and AWS Map of String

To read:

input := service.ExampleOperationInput{}

if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(map[string]interface{}); ok && len(v) > 0 {
    apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandStringMap(v)
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.StringValueMap(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeSet of Resource and AWS List of Structure

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(*schema.Set); ok && v.Len() > 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandServiceStructures(v.List())
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = flattenServiceNestedStructures(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(*schema.Set); ok && v.Len() > 0 {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = expandStringSet(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.StringValueSlice(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeString and AWS String

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(string); ok && v != "" {
        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.String(v)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.StringValue(v)
    }

    // ...
}

Nested TypeString and AWS Timestamp

To ensure that parsing the read string value does not fail, define nested_attribute_name's schema.Schema with an appropriate ValidateFunc:

"nested_attribute_name": {
    Type:         schema.TypeString,
    // ...
    ValidateFunc: validation.IsRFC3339Time,
},

To read:

func expandServiceStructure(tfMap map[string]interface{}) *service.Structure {
    // ...

    if v, ok := tfMap["nested_attribute_name"].(string); ok && v != "" {
        t, _ := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, v.(string))

        apiObject.NestedAttributeName = aws.Time(t)
    }

    // ...
}

To write:

func flattenServiceStructure(apiObject *service.Structure) map[string]interface{} {
    // ...

    if v := apiObject.NestedAttributeName; v != nil {
        tfMap["nested_attribute_name"] = aws.TimeValue(v).Format(time.RFC3339)
    }

    // ...
}

Further Guidelines

This section includes additional topics related to data design and decision making from the Terraform AWS Provider maintainers.

Binary Values

Certain resources may need to interact with binary (non UTF-8) data while the Terraform State only supports UTF-8 data. Configurations attempting to pass binary data to an attribute will receive an error from Terraform CLI. These attributes should expect and store the value as a Base64 string while performing any necessary encoding or decoding in the resource logic.

Destroy State Values

During resource destroy operations, only previously applied Terraform State values are available to resource logic. Even if the configuration is updated in a manner where both the resource destroy is triggered (e.g. setting the resource meta-argument count = 0) and an attribute value is updated, the resource logic will only have the previously applied data values.

Any usage of attribute values during destroy should explicitly note in the resource documentation that the desired value must be applied into the Terraform State before any apply to destroy the resource.

Hashed Values

Attribute values may be very lengthy or potentially contain Sensitive Values. A potential solution might be to use a hashing algorithm, such as MD5 or SHA256, to convert the value before saving in the Terraform State to reduce its relative size or attempt to obfuscate the value. However, there are a few reasons not to do so:

Terraform expects any planned values to match applied values. Ensuring proper handling during the various Terraform operations such as difference planning and Terraform State storage can be a burden.
Hashed values are generally unusable in downstream attribute references. If a value is hashed, it cannot be successfully used in another resource or provider configuration that expects the real value.
Terraform plan differences are meant to be human readable. If a value is hashed, operators will only see the relatively unhelpful hash differences abc123 -> def456 in plans.

Any value hashing implementation will not be accepted. An exception to this guidance is if the remote system explicitly provides a separate hash value in responses, in which a resource can provide a separate attribute with that hashed value.

Sensitive Values

Marking an Attribute in the Terraform Plugin SDK Schema with Sensitive has the following real world implications:

All occurrences of the Attribute will have the value hidden in plan difference output. In the context of an Attribute within a Block, all Blocks will hide all values of the Attribute.
In Terraform CLI 0.14 (with the provider_sensitive_attrs experiment enabled) and later, any downstream references to the value in other configuration will hide the value in plan difference output.

The value is either always hidden or not as the Terraform Plugin SDK does not currently implement conditional support for this functionality. Since Terraform Configurations have no control over the behavior, hiding values from the plan difference can incur a potentially undesirable user experience cost for operators.

Given that and especially with the improvements in Terraform CLI 0.14, the Terraform AWS Provider maintainers guiding principles for determining whether an Attribute should be marked as Sensitive is if an Attribute value:

Objectively will always contain a credential, password, or other secret material. Operators can have differing opinions on what constitutes secret material and the maintainers will make best effort determinations, if necessary consulting with the HashiCorp Security team.
If the Attribute is within a Block, that all occurrences of the Attribute value will objectively contain secret material. Some APIs (and therefore the Terraform AWS Provider resources) implement generic "setting" and "value" structures which likely will contain a mixture of secret and non-secret material. These will generally not be accepted for marking as Sensitive.

If you are unsatisfied with sensitive value handling, the maintainers can recommend ensuring there is a covering issue in the Terraform CLI and/or Terraform Plugin SDK projects explaining the use case. Ultimately, Terraform Plugins including the Terraform AWS Provider cannot implement their own sensitive value abilities if the upstream projects do not implement the appropriate functionality.

Virtual Attributes

Attributes which only exist within Terraform and not the remote system are typically referred as virtual attributes. Especially in the case of Destroy State Values, these attributes rely on the Implicit State Passthrough behavior of values in Terraform to be available in resource logic. A fictitous example of one of these may be a resource attribute such as a skip_waiting flag, which is used only in the resource logic to skip the typical behavior of waiting for operations to complete.

If a virtual attribute has a default value that does not match the Zero Value Mapping for the type, it is recommended to explicitly call d.Set() with the default value in the schema.Resource Importer State function, for example:

&schema.Resource{
	// ... other fields ...
	Importer: &schema.ResourceImporter{
		State: func(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) ([]*schema.ResourceData, error) {
			d.Set("skip_waiting", true)

			return []*schema.ResourceData{d}, nil
		},
	},
}

This helps prevent an immediate plan difference after resource import unless the configuration has a non-default value.

Glossary

Below is a listing of relevant terms and descriptions for data handling and conversion in the Terraform AWS Provider to establish common conventions throughout this documentation. This list is not exhaustive of all concepts of Terraform Plugins, the Terraform AWS Provider, or the data handling that occurs during Terraform runs, but these should generally provide enough context about the topics discussed here.

AWS Go SDK: Library that converts Go code into AWS Service API compatible operations and data types. Currently refers to version 1 (v1) available since 2015, however version 2 (v2) will reach general availability status soon. Project.
AWS Go SDK Model: AWS Go SDK compatible format of AWS Service API Model.
AWS Go SDK Service: AWS Service API Go code generated from the AWS Go SDK Model. Generated by the AWS Go SDK code.
AWS Service API: Logical boundary of an AWS service by API endpoint. Some large AWS services may be marketed with many different product names under the same service API (e.g. VPC functionality is part of the EC2 API) and vice-versa where some services may be marketed with one product name but are split into multiple service APIs (e.g. Single Sign-On functionality is split into the Identity Store and SSO Admin APIs).
AWS Service API Model: Declarative description of the AWS Service API operations and data types. Generated by the AWS service teams. Used to operate the API and generate API clients such as the various AWS Software Development Kits (SDKs).
Terraform Language ("Configuration"): Configuration syntax interpreted by the Terraform CLI. An implementation of HCL. Full Documentation.
Terraform Plugin Protocol: Description of Terraform Plugin operations and data types. Currently based on the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) library gRPC.
Terraform Plugin Go: Low-level library that converts Go code into Terraform Plugin Protocol compatible operations and data types. Not currently implemented in the Terraform AWS Provider. Project.
Terraform Plugin SDK: High-level library that converts Go code into Terraform Plugin Protocol compatible operations and data types. Project.
Terraform Plugin SDK Schema: Declarative description of types and domain specific behaviors for a Terraform provider, including resources and attributes. Full Documentation.
Terraform State: Bindings between objects in a remote system (e.g. an EC2 VPC) and a Terraform configuration (e.g. an aws_vpc resource configuration). Full Documentation.

AWS Service API Models use specific terminology to describe data and types:

Enumeration: Collection of valid values for a Shape.
Operation: An API call. Includes information about input, output, and error Shapes.
Shape: Type description.
- boolean: Boolean value.
- float: Fractional numeric value. May contain value validation such as maximum or minimum.
- integer: Whole numeric value. May contain value validation such as maximum or minimum.
- list: Collection that contains member Shapes. May contain value validation such as maximum or minimum keys.
- map: Grouping of key Shape to value Shape. May contain value validation such as maximum or minimum keys.
- string: Sequence of characters. May contain value validation such as an enumeration, regular expression pattern, maximum length, or minimum length.
- structure: Object that contains member Shapes. May represent an error.
- timestamp: Date and time value.

The Terraform Language uses the following terminology to describe data and types:

Attribute ("Argument"): Assigns a name to a data value.
Block ("Configuration Block"): Container type for Attributes or Blocks.
null: Virtual value equivalent to the Attribute not being set.
Types: Full Documentation.
- any: Virtual type representing any concrete type in type declarations.
- bool: Boolean value.
- list ("tuple"): Ordered collection of values.
- map ("object"): Grouping of string keys to values.
- number: Numeric value. Can be either whole or fractional numbers.
- set: Unordered collection of values.
- string: Sequence of characters.

Terraform Plugin SDK Schemas use the following terminology to describe data and types:

Behaviors: Full Documentation.
- Sensitive: Whether the value should be hidden from user interface output.
- StateFunc: Conversion function between the value set by the Terraform Plugin and the value seen by Terraform Plugin SDK (and ultimately the Terraform State).
Element: Underylying value type for a collection or grouping Schema.
Resource Data: Data representation of a Resource Schema. Translation layer between the Schema and Go code of a Terraform Plugin. In the Terraform Plugin SDK, the ResourceData Go type.
Resource Schema: Grouping of Schema that represents a Terraform Resource.
Schema: Represents an Attribute or Block. Has a Type and Behavior(s).
Types: Full Documentation.
- TypeBool: Boolean value.
- TypeFloat: Fractional numeric value.
- TypeInt: Whole numeric value.
- TypeList: Ordered collection of values or Blocks.
- TypeMap: Grouping of key Type to value Type.
- TypeSet: Unordered collection of values or Blocks.
- TypeString: Sequence of characters value.

Some other terms that may be used:

Block Attribute ("Child Attribute", "Nested Attribute"): Block level Attribute.
Expand Function: Function that converts Terraform Plugin SDK data into the equivalent AWS Go SDK type.
Flatten Function: Function that converts an AWS Go SDK type into the equivalent Terraform Plugin SDK data.
NullableTypeBool: Workaround "schema type" created to accept a boolean value that is not configured in addition to true and false. Not implemented in the Terraform Plugin SDK, but uses TypeString (where "" represents not configured) and additional validation.
NullableTypeFloat: Workaround "schema type" created to accept a fractional numeric value that is not configured in addition to 0.0. Not implemented in the Terraform Plugin SDK, but uses TypeString (where "" represents not configured) and additional validation.
NullableTypeInt: Workaround "schema type" created to accept a whole numeric value that is not configured in addition to 0. Not implemented in the Terraform Plugin SDK, but uses TypeString (where "" represents not configured) and additional validation.
Root Attribute: Resource top level Attribute or Block.

For additional reference, the Terraform documentation also includes a full glossary of terminology.

Files

data-handling-and-conversion.md

Latest commit

History

data-handling-and-conversion.md

File metadata and controls

Data Handling and Conversion

Data Conversions in Terraform Providers

Implicit State Passthrough

Data Conversions in the Terraform AWS Provider

Type Mapping

Zero Value Mapping

Root Attributes Versus Block Attributes

Recommended Implementations

Expand Functions for Blocks

Flatten Functions for Blocks

Root TypeBool and AWS Boolean

Root TypeFloat and AWS Float

Root TypeInt and AWS Integer

Root TypeList of Resource and AWS List of Structure

Root TypeList of Resource and AWS Structure

Root TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

Root TypeMap of TypeString and AWS Map of String

Root TypeSet of Resource and AWS List of Structure

Root TypeSet of TypeString and AWS List of String

Root TypeString and AWS String

Root TypeString and AWS Timestamp

Nested TypeBool and AWS Boolean

Nested TypeFloat and AWS Float

Nested TypeInt and AWS Integer

Nested TypeList of Resource and AWS List of Structure

Nested TypeList of Resource and AWS Structure

Nested TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

Nested TypeMap of TypeString and AWS Map of String

Nested TypeSet of Resource and AWS List of Structure

Nested TypeList of TypeString and AWS List of String

Nested TypeString and AWS String

Nested TypeString and AWS Timestamp

Further Guidelines

Binary Values

Destroy State Values

Hashed Values

Sensitive Values

Virtual Attributes

Glossary