Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cli): discover must return a list #266

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024
Merged

fix(cli): discover must return a list #266

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024

Conversation

rokam
Copy link
Contributor

@rokam rokam commented Aug 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced device discovery functionality now supports returning multiple discovered devices.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling during device discovery by returning an empty list instead of None when no devices are found.
  • Improvements

    • The set_attribute method updated to work seamlessly with the new device discovery process, ensuring robust device management.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test coverage for device discovery and attribute setting, enhancing validation for various scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates to the MideaDevice class significantly enhance its device discovery capabilities. The discover method now returns a list of MideaDevice instances, allowing the detection of multiple devices, which increases overall reliability. The set_attribute method has also been revised to work with this new return type, ensuring smooth operation within the device management system.

Changes

Files Change Summary
midealocal/cli.py Updated discover method to return a list of MideaDevice instances, enhancing multiple device detection. Modified set_attribute to handle the new list return type, processing only a single device when necessary.
tests/cli_test.py Adjusted test_discover and test_download to accommodate changes in discover method; improved assertion logic and mock setup for better test coverage.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant MideaDevice
    participant DeviceManager

    User->>DeviceManager: Initiate discovery
    DeviceManager->>MideaDevice: Call discover()
    MideaDevice->>MideaDevice: Search for devices
    MideaDevice->>MideaDevice: Append found devices to device_list
    MideaDevice-->>DeviceManager: Return device_list
    DeviceManager-->>User: Provide list of discovered devices
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the meadow of code, oh what a sight,
Multiple devices now dance in delight!
With a list in our hands, we gather them near,
No more lone wanderers, let’s cheer and cheer!
Error handling’s bright, our path is now clear,
Hop along, hop along, for progress is here! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rokam rokam marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2024 02:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
midealocal/cli.py (2)

Line range hint 68-107:
Update the docstring to reflect the new return type.

The discover method now returns a list of MideaDevice instances. Update the docstring to document this change.

    """Discover device information.

    Returns:
        list[MideaDevice]: A list of discovered devices.
    """
Tools
Ruff

75-75: return is not documented in docstring

(DOC201)


173-189: Consider logging when the device list length is not one.

Adding a log message when the device list length is not one can help with debugging and provide more context in the logs.

        if len(device_list) != 1:
+           _LOGGER.warning("Expected exactly one device, found %d.", len(device_list))
            return
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e40581 and d7dd324.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • midealocal/cli.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
midealocal/cli.py

75-75: return is not documented in docstring

(DOC201)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 8, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.76%. Comparing base (9286120) to head (999add9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #266      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.74%   37.76%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          84       84              
  Lines        7469     7470       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2819     2821       +2     
+ Misses       4650     4649       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rokam rokam enabled auto-merge (squash) August 9, 2024 08:09
wuwentao
wuwentao previously approved these changes Aug 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
midealocal/cli.py (1)

Line range hint 68-117:
Update the docstring to document the return type.

The return type has changed to a list of MideaDevice instances. Update the docstring to reflect this change.

-    """Discover device information."""
+    """Discover device information.
+
+    Returns:
+        list[MideaDevice]: A list of discovered MideaDevice instances.
+    """
Tools
Ruff

75-75: return is not documented in docstring

(DOC201)

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7dd324 and 4d05428.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • midealocal/cli.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
midealocal/cli.py

75-75: return is not documented in docstring

(DOC201)

Additional comments not posted (2)
midealocal/cli.py (2)

Line range hint 68-117:
LGTM! The changes improve robustness.

The modifications to handle multiple devices and return a list enhance the functionality and robustness of the discover method.

Tools
Ruff

75-75: return is not documented in docstring

(DOC201)


183-199: LGTM! The changes align with the updated return type of discover.

The set_attribute method correctly handles the list of devices returned by discover and ensures that only a single device is processed.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d05428 and 999add9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/cli_test.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/cli_test.py (3)

134-134: Enhance side effect handling for robustness.

The side_effect changes in authenticate and refresh_status allow testing multiple scenarios, which improves test coverage and robustness.

Also applies to: 139-139


151-152: Update assertions to allow multiple calls.

Changing assertions from assert_called_once() to assert_called() is appropriate here, as it accommodates multiple invocations, reflecting realistic usage scenarios.


273-279: Improve test coverage with multiple discovery scenarios.

The side_effect changes in the discover method enhance the test by simulating multiple device discovery scenarios, ensuring comprehensive coverage.

@rokam rokam merged commit 345794b into main Aug 10, 2024
10 checks passed
@rokam rokam deleted the fix-cli-discover-return branch August 10, 2024 03:47
@rokam rokam mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2024
rokam added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [2.6.2](v2.6.1...v2.6.2)
(2024-08-10)


### Bug Fixes

* **cli:** discover must return a list
([#266](#266))
([345794b](345794b))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants